Literature DB >> 16132989

Evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Yuichiro Morishita1, Shinichi Hida, Masatoshi Naito, Ushio Matsushima.   

Abstract

Fourteen patients who had cervical spine surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with median-nerve short-latency somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) were followed preoperatively and until six months postoperatively. We evaluated the N18 latency and compared it with the JOA score recovery rate for each period. Seven patients demonstrated improvement in the N18 latency immediately following the operation and showed improvement of upper- as well as lower-extremity function 12 weeks postoperatively. We found a statistically significant correlation between improvement in the SSEP during the early decompression period and a good surgical outcome at 12 weeks postoperatively. We conclude that evaluating the median nerve SSEP is useful for prediction of the prognosis in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated surgically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132989      PMCID: PMC2231578          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-005-0002-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  16 in total

1.  Experimental cervical myelopathy. Effects of ischemia and compression of the canine cervical spinal cord.

Authors:  M R Gooding; C B Wilson; J T Hoff
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The role of upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: preliminary data.

Authors:  D Restuccia; V Di Lazzaro; M Valeriani; L Aulisa; M Galli; P Tonali; F Mauguière
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11

3.  The value of ulnar somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  M Veilleux; J R Daube
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-11

4.  CT myelographic findings in degenerative disorders of the cervical spine: clinical significance.

Authors:  L Penning; J T Wilmink; H H van Woerden; E Knol
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  The mechanism of ischemia in anteroposterior compression of the spinal cord.

Authors:  J L Doppman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1975 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Somatosensory evoked response evaluation of cervical spondylytic myelopathy.

Authors:  S J Perlik; M A Fisher
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in cervical spondylosis. Correlation of median, ulnar and posterior tibial nerve responses with clinical and radiological findings.

Authors:  Y L Yu; S J Jones
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Somatosensory conduction times and peripheral, cervical and cortical evoked potentials in patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  T Ganes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine.

Authors:  H Ogino; K Tada; K Okada; K Yonenobu; T Yamamoto; K Ono; H Namiki
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex correlates with objective clinical measures in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Marcus D Mazur; Andrea White; Sara McEvoy; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cervical myelopathy due to single level prolapsed disc and spondylosis: a comparative study on outcome between two groups.

Authors:  Jong-Seon Ryu; Jong-Woo Chae; Woo-Jin Cho; Han Chang; Myung-Sang Moon; Sung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Trial-to-trial latency variability of somatosensory evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hongyan Cui; Yazhou Wang; Xiang Li; Xiaobo Xie; Shengpu Xu; Yong Hu
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Component analysis of somatosensory evoked potentials for identifying spinal cord injury location.

Authors:  Yazhou Wang; Guangsheng Li; Keith D K Luk; Yong Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: How to Identify the Best Responders to Surgery?

Authors:  Rocco Severino; Aria Nouri; Enrico Tessitore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic X-ray's correlations with dynamic electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zhengran Yu; Kaiyuan Lin; Jiacheng Chen; Kuan-Hung Chen; Wei Guo; Yuhu Dai; Yuguang Chen; Xuenong Zou; Xinsheng Peng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Increased signal intensity of spinal cord on T2W magnetic resonance imaging for cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients: Risk factors and prognosis (a STROBE-compliant article).

Authors:  Li-Qiang Yin; Jian Zhang; Yong-Gui Wu; Jin-Hui Li; Qing Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy exhibit neurophysiological improvement upon extension and flexion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zhengran Yu; Jiacheng Chen; Xing Cheng; Dingxiang Xie; Yuguang Chen; Xuenong Zou; Xinsheng Peng
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.474

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.