Literature DB >> 14742087

Study design in qualitative research--1: Developing questions and assessing resource needs.

R M Frankel1, K J Devers.   

Abstract

This is the second in a series of four papers on understanding and doing qualitative research [Frankel & Devers (2000) Qualitative research: a consumer's guide, Education for Health, 13, 113-123; Devers & Frankel (2000) Study design in qualitative research--2: sampling and data collection strategies, Education for Health, 13, 263-271]. Here, we focus on problems of study design, including question development, literature review, identifying a target audience and resource needs assessment. We provide a step-by-step description of major issues and choice points in the process. There are three key differences between qualitative and quantitative research designs. First, the logic of qualitative research is often inductive, rather than deductive, and consists of describing people's and groups' particular situations, meanings and experiences. Second, qualitative research designs are often emergent and flexible, and the research itself is quite dynamic. Third, the qualitative research process is non-linear and non-sequential. There is agreement that good qualitative studies answer clearly stated, important research questions. How qualitative research questions are formulated has implications for conducting a literature review. Some scholars believe that literature should be reviewed prior to beginning a study; others argue that this may impede the researcher from truly listening, observing and remaining open to new concepts and ideas. We offer suggestions about formulating research questions and how and when to conduct a literature review. Another important issue in conducting qualitative research is determining the resources that will be needed to conduct a study. These include internal resources, such as research skills, and external resources, such as personnel (expertise and time), equipment, supplies and travel. A description of typical resource and management issues in conducting a qualitative research study is included.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 14742087     DOI: 10.1080/13576280050074534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)        ISSN: 1357-6283


  7 in total

1.  Medical patients' attitudes toward emotional problems and their treatment. What do they really want?

Authors:  Bernd Löwe; Ute Schulz; Kerstin Gräfe; Stefanie Wilke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient-centredness: meaning and propriety in the Botswana, African and non-Western contexts.

Authors:  Vincent Setlhare; Ian Couper; Anne Wright
Journal:  Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med       Date:  2014

3.  Digital Health Testbeds in Sweden: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Md Shafiqur Rahman Jabin; Evalill Nilsson; Anna-Lena Nilsson; Patrick Bergman; Päivi Jokela
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  "Even if I were to consent, my family will never agree": exploring autopsy services for posthumous occupational lung disease compensation among mineworkers in South Africa.

Authors:  Audrey V Banyini; David Rees; Leah Gilbert
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Becoming the best mom that I can: women's experiences of managing depression during pregnancy--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Heather A Bennett; Heather S Boon; Sarah E Romans; Paul Grootendorst
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Community acceptability and adoption of integrated community case management in Uganda.

Authors:  Agnes Nanyonjo; Maureen Nakirunda; Frederick Makumbi; Göran Tomson; Karin Källander
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.345

7.  An analysis of community perceptions of mosquito-borne disease control and prevention in Sint Eustatius, Caribbean Netherlands.

Authors:  Teresa E Leslie; Marianne Carson; Els van Coeverden; Kirsten De Klein; Marieta Braks; Anja Krumeich
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.