AIM: To assess whether there is any advantage to be gained with respect to performance in the first year of postgraduate medical training (internship) by selecting medical school candidates with different educational backgrounds. Specifically, we were interested in comparing the performance ratings of interns who entered medical school with secondary (directly from high school) or tertiary (at least one year of a university degree) level educational backgrounds. FOCUS: We compared the performance ratings of interns according to the subjects or degree undertaken at a secondary or tertiary level, respectively. The effects of age and gender were also examined to determine their influence on performance ratings. METHOD: All graduates (N=235) from the University of Newcastle Medical School, Australia who commenced their intern year in the state of New South Wales from 1993 to 1996 inclusive were eligible for the study. The outcome measure was a score derived from a valid and reliable clinical supervisor rating scale. Independent variables were level of previous educational experience (secondary or tertiary entry), and subjects studied by secondary level entrants (predominantly science or equal proportions of humanities and science) and degree undertaken by tertiary level entrants (arts or science or allied health or nursing). RESULTS: The records of 173 (73% of eligible sample) were included in the analyses. There were no significant differences between the mean ratings of interns with respect to previous educational background, subjects studied at secondary school or degree undertaken. Age and gender did not significantly affect performance ratings.
AIM: To assess whether there is any advantage to be gained with respect to performance in the first year of postgraduate medical training (internship) by selecting medical school candidates with different educational backgrounds. Specifically, we were interested in comparing the performance ratings of interns who entered medical school with secondary (directly from high school) or tertiary (at least one year of a university degree) level educational backgrounds. FOCUS: We compared the performance ratings of interns according to the subjects or degree undertaken at a secondary or tertiary level, respectively. The effects of age and gender were also examined to determine their influence on performance ratings. METHOD: All graduates (N=235) from the University of Newcastle Medical School, Australia who commenced their intern year in the state of New South Wales from 1993 to 1996 inclusive were eligible for the study. The outcome measure was a score derived from a valid and reliable clinical supervisor rating scale. Independent variables were level of previous educational experience (secondary or tertiary entry), and subjects studied by secondary level entrants (predominantly science or equal proportions of humanities and science) and degree undertaken by tertiary level entrants (arts or science or allied health or nursing). RESULTS: The records of 173 (73% of eligible sample) were included in the analyses. There were no significant differences between the mean ratings of interns with respect to previous educational background, subjects studied at secondary school or degree undertaken. Age and gender did not significantly affect performance ratings.