Literature DB >> 14741654

Interindividual differences of medial temporal lobe activation during encoding in an elderly population studied by fMRI.

M W G Vandenbroucke1, R Goekoop, E J J Duschek, J C Netelenbos, J P A Kuijer, F Barkhof, Ph Scheltens, S A R B Rombouts.   

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) is used to study medial temporal lobe (MTL) activation during encoding of new information into memory. In most studies, fMRI data of different subjects are averaged in standard coordinate space. However, interindividual differences in activation can be extensive, reflecting functional heterogeneity. Further, anatomical differences in brain structure cause additional variance and loss of registration accuracy. Such differences in structural and functional MTL characteristics may interfere with the efficiency of averaging data across subjects, and may become more significant with aging and dementia. The current study concerns the analysis of individual differences in MTL activation associated with episodic encoding.Twenty-nine healthy elderly men between 60 and 70 years old performed a simple face encoding task during fMRI scanning. Individual data were analyzed in native space, and compared to the group average in standard space (Talairach and Tournoux).MTL volumes between subjects varied between 6.34 and 11.27 cm(3), and had considerable variation when mapped to standard space. Eighteen of the 29 subjects showed MTL activity and activation patterns varied both in location and size (ranging from 0.11 to 1.78 cm(3)), with the strongest activation in the left posterior part of the MTL. In standard space, no region was significantly activated on a group level at a comparable alpha level. We conclude that while the majority of elderly subjects show MTL activation during episodic encoding of faces, there is considerable structural and functional variability between subjects. Group analysis in standard space may not be appropriate for studies of a complex structure such as the MTL, particularly not in aging and dementia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14741654     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  12 in total

1.  Variability of fMRI activation during a phonological and semantic language task in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; François Lazeyras; Alan J Pegna; Jean-Marie Annoni; Ivan Zimine; Eugène Mayer; Christoph M Michel; Asaid Khateb
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Hippocampal atrophy confounds template-based functional MR imaging measures of hippocampal activation in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  C K Sandstrom; S Krishnan; M J Slavin; T-T T Tran; P M Doraiswamy; J R Petrella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  The intersubject and intrasubject reproducibility of FMRI activation during three encoding tasks: implications for clinical applications.

Authors:  Greg S Harrington; Sarah Tomaszewski Farias; Michael H Buonocore; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Verbal paired-associate learning by APOE genotype in non-demented older adults: fMRI evidence of a right hemispheric compensatory response.

Authors:  S Duke Han; Wes S Houston; Amy J Jak; Lisa T Eyler; Bonnie J Nagel; Adam S Fleisher; Gregory G Brown; Jody Corey-Bloom; David P Salmon; Leon J Thal; Mark W Bondi
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Altered prefrontal function with aging: insights into age-associated performance decline.

Authors:  Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Galit Fuhrmann Alpert; Ansgar J Furst; Laura A Hale; Tatsuhide Oga; Sundari Chetty; Natasha Pickard; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  How much are clinical fMRI reports influenced by standard postprocessing methods? An investigation of normalization and region of interest effects in the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Roland Beisteiner; Nicolaus Klinger; Ilse Höllinger; Jakob Rath; Susanne Gruber; Thomas Steinkellner; Thomas Foki; Alexander Geissler
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Entorhinal cortex volume is associated with episodic memory related brain activation in normal aging and amnesic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Mehul A Trivedi; Travis R Stoub; Christopher M Murphy; Sarah George; Leyla deToledo-Morrell; Raj C Shah; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; John D E Gabrieli; Glenn T Stebbins
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.978

8.  fMRI evidence of compensatory mechanisms in older adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  Mark W Bondi; Wes S Houston; Lisa T Eyler; Gregory G Brown
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Neural correlates of novelty and face-age effects in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Christopher I Wright; Alyson Negreira; Andrea L Gold; Jennifer C Britton; Danielle Williams; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Effects of single-trial averaging on spatial extent of brain activation detected by fMRI are subject and task dependent.

Authors:  Sy Fang; Jj Wang; Yy Hsu; Yl Wan; Yy Wai; Hl Liu
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.