Literature DB >> 14740980

Osteopathic manipulative treatment in prenatal care: a retrospective case control design study.

Hollis H King1, Melicien A Tettambel, Michael D Lockwood, Kenneth H Johnson, Debra A Arsenault, Ryan Quist.   

Abstract

The use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) during pregnancy has a long tradition in osteopathic medicine. A retrospective study was designed to compare a group of women who received prenatal OMT with a matched group that did not receive prenatal OMT. The medical records of 160 women from four cities who received prenatal OMT were reviewed for the occurrence of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, preterm delivery, use of forceps, and cesarean delivery. The randomly selected records of 161 women who were from the same cities, but who did not receive prenatal OMT, were reviewed for the same outcomes. The results of a logistic regression analysis were statistically reliable, chi2 (4, N = 321) = 26.55; P < .001, indicating that the labor and delivery outcomes, as a set, were associated with whether OMT was administered during pregnancy. According to the Wald criterion, prenatal OMT was significantly associated with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (Z = 13.20, P < .001) and preterm delivery (Z = 9.91; P < .01), while the use of forceps was found to be marginally significant (Z = 3.28; P = .07). The case control study found evidence of improved outcomes in labor and delivery for women who received prenatal OMT, compared with women who did not. A prospective study is proposed as the next step in evaluating the effects of prenatal OMT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14740980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc        ISSN: 0098-6151


  8 in total

1.  Educating osteopaths to be researchers - what role should research methods and statistics have in an undergraduate curriculum?

Authors:  John C Licciardone
Journal:  Int J Osteopath Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.149

2.  Pregnancy and chiropractic: a narrative review of the literature.

Authors:  Cara L Borggren
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2007-06

3.  Pregnancy Research on Osteopathic Manipulation Optimizing Treatment Effects: the PROMOTE study.

Authors:  Kendi L Hensel; Steve Buchanan; Sarah K Brown; Mayra Rodriguez; des Anges Cruser
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  The Role of Osteopathic Care in Gynaecology and Obstetrics: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nuria Ruffini; Giandomenico D'Alessandro; Annalisa Pimpinella; Matteo Galli; Tiziana Galeotti; Francesco Cerritelli; Marco Tramontano
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18

5.  Osteopathic manipulative treatment of back pain and related symptoms during pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John C Licciardone; Steve Buchanan; Kendi L Hensel; Hollis H King; Kimberly G Fulda; Scott T Stoll
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of exercise, spinal manipulation, and neuro emotional technique for the treatment of pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  Caroline D Peterson; Mitchell Haas; W Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-06-13

Review 7.  Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour.

Authors:  Caroline A Smith; Kate M Levett; Carmel T Collins; Hannah G Dahlen; Carolyn C Ee; Machiko Suganuma
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-28

Review 8.  Integrating complementary/alternative medicine into primary care: evaluating the evidence and appropriate implementation.

Authors:  Stanley F Wainapel; Stephanie Rand; Loren M Fishman; Jennifer Halstead-Kenny
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2015-12-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.