Literature DB >> 14740094

[Feasibilities and limitations of high field parallel MRI].

R M Heidemann1, M A Griswold, M Müller, F Breuer, M Blaimer, B Kiefer, M Schmitt, P M Jakob.   

Abstract

In medical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) it is standard to use MR scanners with a field strength of 1.5 Tesla. Recently, an ongoing development to higher field strength can be observed and a new clinical standard at 3.0 Tesla seems to be established. High field MRI with its intrinsic higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) can enable new applications of MRI in medical diagnosis, or can serve to improve existing methods. It is important to note, that the use of high field MRI is not without its limitations. Besides the SNR, other unwanted effects increase with a higher field strength. Without correction, these high field problems cause a serious loss in image quality. An elegant way to address these problems is the use of parallel imaging. In many clinical applications, parallel MRI (pMRI) is part of the standard protocol, because pMRI can enhance virtually every MRI application, without necessarily affecting the contrast behavior of the underlying imaging sequence. In high field MRI, besides the speed advantage of pMRI, the positive influence on high field specific problems and therefore on the image quality will be of major importance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14740094     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-0977-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  5 in total

1.  Resolution enhancement in single-shot imaging using simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH).

Authors:  M A Griswold; P M Jakob; Q Chen; J W Goldfarb; W J Manning; R R Edelman; D K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI.

Authors:  K P Pruessmann; M Weiger; M B Scheidegger; P Boesiger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA).

Authors:  Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Johan S van den Brink; Yuji Watanabe; Christiane K Kuhl; Taylor Chung; Raja Muthupillai; Marc Van Cauteren; Kei Yamada; Steven Dymarkowski; Jan Bogaert; Jeff H Maki; Celso Matos; Jan W Casselman; Romhild M Hoogeveen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR.

Authors:  J Hennig; A Nauerth; H Friedburg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  [Cardiovascular whole-body MRI: possibilities and limitations in prevention].

Authors:  C U Herborn; F M Vogt; M Goyen; S C Goehde; S G Ruehm; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Modern visualization of the liver with MRT. Current trends and future perspectives].

Authors:  C J Zech; S O Schoenberg; K A Herrmann; O Dietrich; M I Menzel; T Lanz; A Wallnöfer; T Helmberger; M F Reiser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Enhancing gray-to-white matter contrast in 3T T1 spin-echo brain scans by optimizing flip angle.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Georg Grön; Florian Brausewetter; Martin H K Hoffmann; Andrik J Aschoff
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  MRA of abdominal vessels: technical advances.

Authors:  Henrik J Michaely; Olaf Dietrich; Kambiz Nael; Sabine Weckbach; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Impact of field strength and RF excitation on abdominal diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Philipp Riffel; Raghuram K Rao; Stefan Haneder; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-09-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.