Literature DB >> 14737763

Electric-current-induced detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains from surgical stainless steel.

A J van der Borden1, H C van der Mei, H J Busscher.   

Abstract

Infection of percutaneous biomaterials implants, such as fixation frames used for the repair of complicated fractures in orthopedics, is a major complication that almost inevitably leads to replacement of the implant. As antibiotic therapy usually has little impact on biomaterial-associated infections, it is the aim of this article to examine whether implant-associated Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus strains could be stimulated to detach from a surgical stainless steel anode during application of an electric current. First, bacteria were allowed to adhere from a flowing suspension of physiological ionic strength in a parallel plate flow chamber to a stainless-steel surface, after which the suspension was replaced by a bacterium-free solution with a specified ionic strength (0.5-150-mM potassium phosphate). DC currents ranging from 15 to 125 microA were applied to induce bacterial detachment. Initial detachment decreased with increasing ionic strength at 100 microA. The percentage detachment achieved by application of an electric current after 2.5 h was highest (95%) in 1-mM potassium phosphate and decreased to 15% when the ionic strength exceeded 40 mM. The electric current did not significantly affect the percentage detachment, but initial detachment rates increased with increasing current from 1000 cm(-2) s(-1) at 15 microA to 7000 cm(-2) s(-1) at 125 microA. Although different isolates of S. epidermidis and S. aureus showed different patterns of current-induced detachment, all strains could be stimulated to detach. The results of this study define ionic-strength conditions and electric currents yielding staphylococcal detachment from surgical stainless steel and therewith point to a pathway for the treatment and prevention of percutaneous metal-implant infection. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 68B: 160-164, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14737763     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.20015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  11 in total

1.  Cathodic Electrical Stimulation Combined With Vancomycin Enhances Treatment of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Implant-associated Infections.

Authors:  Scott Nodzo; Menachem Tobias; Lisa Hansen; Nicole R Luke-Marshall; Ross Cole; Linda Wild; Anthony A Campagnari; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Thermal mitigation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  Ann O'Toole; Erica B Ricker; Eric Nuxoll
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.209

3.  Effects of polarization in the presence and absence of biocides on biofilms in a simulated paper machine water.

Authors:  Minna Peltola; Teemu Kuosmanen; Hanna Sinkko; Niina Vesalainen; Martti Pulliainen; Päivi Korhonen; Kirsi Partti-Pellinen; Jari P Räsänen; Juha Rintala; Marko Kolari; Hannu Rita; Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Electric current-induced detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms from surgical stainless steel.

Authors:  Arnout J van der Borden; Hester van der Werf; Henny C van der Mei; Henk J Busscher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  The electricidal effect: reduction of Staphylococcus and pseudomonas biofilms by prolonged exposure to low-intensity electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation using electrical current.

Authors:  Jose L Del Pozo; Mark S Rouse; Gorane Euba; Kerryl E Greenwood-Quaintance; Jayawant N Mandrekar; James M Steckelberg; Robin Patel
Journal:  J Appl Biomater Funct Mater       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 2.604

7.  Aryl rhodanines specifically inhibit staphylococcal and enterococcal biofilm formation.

Authors:  Timothy J Opperman; Steven M Kwasny; John D Williams; Atiyya R Khan; Norton P Peet; Donald T Moir; Terry L Bowlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Bioelectric effect and bacterial biofilms. A systematic review.

Authors:  J L Del Pozo; M S Rouse; R Patel
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.595

9.  Cathodic Voltage-controlled Electrical Stimulation Plus Prolonged Vancomycin Reduce Bacterial Burden of a Titanium Implant-associated Infection in a Rodent Model.

Authors:  Scott R Nodzo; Menachem Tobias; Richard Ahn; Lisa Hansen; Nicole R Luke-Marshall; Craig Howard; Linda Wild; Anthony A Campagnari; Mark T Ehrensberger
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Direct electric current treatment under physiologic saline conditions kills Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms via electrolytic generation of hypochlorous acid.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Sandvik; Bruce R McLeod; Albert E Parker; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.