Literature DB >> 14737077

Acquisition of FLT3 or N-ras mutations is frequently associated with progression of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute myeloid leukemia.

L-Y Shih1, C-F Huang, P-N Wang, J-H Wu, T-L Lin, P Dunn, M-C Kuo.   

Abstract

The role of internal tandem duplication of fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3/ITD), mutations at tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3/TKD) and N-ras mutations in the transformation of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) to AML was investigated in 82 MDS patients who later progressed to AML; 70 of them had paired marrow samples at diagnosis of MDS and AML available for comparative analysis. Five of the 82 patients had FLT3/ITD at presentation. Of the 70 paired samples, seven patients acquired FLT3/ITD during AML evolution. The incidence of FLT3/ITD at diagnosis of MDS was significantly lower than that at AML transformation (3/70 vs 10/70, P<0.001). FLT3/ITD(+) patients progressed to AML more rapidly than FLT3/ITD(-) patients (2.5+/-0.5 vs 11.9+/-1.5 months, P=0.114). FLT3/ITD(+) patients had a significantly shorter survival than FLT3/ITD(-) patients (5.6+/-1.3 vs 18.0+/-1.7 months, P=0.0008). After AML transformation, FLT3/ITD was also associated with an adverse prognosis. One patient had FLT3/TKD mutation (D835Y) at both MDS and AML stages. Additional three acquired FLT3/TKD (one each with D835 H, D835F and I836S) at AML transformation. Five of the 70 matched samples had N-ras mutation at diagnosis of MDS compared to 15 at AML transformation (P<0.001), one lost and 11 gained N-ras mutations at AML progression. Coexistence of FLT3/TKD and N-ras mutations was found in two AML samples. N-ras mutations had no prognostic impact either at the MDS or AML stage. Our results show that one-third of MDS patients acquire activating mutations of FLT3 or N-ras gene during AML evolution and FLT3/ITD predicts a poor outcome in MDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14737077     DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  42 in total

1.  Preclinical efficacy of MEK inhibition in Nras-mutant AML.

Authors:  Michael R Burgess; Eugene Hwang; Ari J Firestone; Tannie Huang; Jin Xu; Johannes Zuber; Natacha Bohin; Tiffany Wen; Scott C Kogan; Kevin M Haigis; Deepak Sampath; Scott Lowe; Kevin Shannon; Qing Li
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clonal architecture of secondary acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Matthew J Walter; Dong Shen; Li Ding; Jin Shao; Daniel C Koboldt; Ken Chen; David E Larson; Michael D McLellan; David Dooling; Rachel Abbott; Robert Fulton; Vincent Magrini; Heather Schmidt; Joelle Kalicki-Veizer; Michelle O'Laughlin; Xian Fan; Marcus Grillot; Sarah Witowski; Sharon Heath; John L Frater; William Eades; Michael Tomasson; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio; Daniel C Link; Elaine R Mardis; Timothy J Ley; Richard K Wilson; Timothy A Graubert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Clonal analysis of NRAS activating mutations in KIT-D816V systemic mastocytosis.

Authors:  Todd M Wilson; Irina Maric; Olga Simakova; Yun Bai; Eunice Ching Chan; Nicolas Olivares; Melody Carter; Dragan Maric; Jamie Robyn; Dean D Metcalfe
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Karyotype evolution and acquisition of FLT3 or RAS pathway alterations drive progression of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Manja Meggendorfer; Andreia de Albuquerque; Niroshan Nadarajah; Tamara Alpermann; Wolfgang Kern; Kimberly Steuer; Karolína Perglerová; Claudia Haferlach; Susanne Schnittger; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.941

5.  The clonal origins of leukemic progression of myelodysplasia.

Authors:  T Kim; M S Tyndel; H J Kim; J-S Ahn; S H Choi; H J Park; Y-K Kim; D-H Yang; J-J Lee; S-H Jung; S Y Kim; Y H Min; J-W Cheong; S K Sohn; J H Moon; M Choi; M Lee; Z Zhang; D D H Kim
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 11.528

6.  Progression, transformation, and unusual manifestations of myelodysplastic syndromes and myelodysplastic-myeloproliferative neoplasms: lessons learned from the XIV European Bone Marrow Working Group Course 2019.

Authors:  Konnie Hebeda; Ludmila Boudova; Christine Beham-Schmid; Attilio Orazi; Hans-Michael Kvasnicka; Umberto Gianelli; Alexandar Tzankov
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 7.  Engineering mouse models with myelodysplastic syndrome human candidate genes; how relevant are they?

Authors:  Stephanie Beurlet; Christine Chomienne; Rose Ann Padua
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 9.941

8.  Leukemia associated antigens: their dual role as biomarkers and immunotherapeutic targets for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Barbara-Ann Guinn; Azim Mohamedali; Ken I Mills; Barbara Czepulkowski; Michael Schmitt; Jochen Greiner
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-14

9.  NRAS mutations with low allele burden have independent prognostic significance for patients with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  D M Murphy; R Bejar; K Stevenson; D Neuberg; Y Shi; C Cubrich; K Richardson; P Eastlake; G Garcia-Manero; H Kantarjian; B L Ebert; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Determination of Ras-GTP and Ras-GDP in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), myeloproliferative syndrome (MPS), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and malignant lymphoma: assessment of mutational and indirect activation.

Authors:  D Raepple; F von Lintig; T Zemojtel; M Duchniewicz; A Jung; M Lübbert; G R Boss; J S Scheele
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.