Literature DB >> 14736831

PET/CT today and tomorrow.

David W Townsend1, Jonathan P J Carney, Jeffrey T Yap, Nathan C Hall.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Accurate anatomic localization of functional abnormalities seen with PET is known to be problematic. Even though nonspecific tracers such as 18F-FDG visualize certain normal anatomic structures, the spatial resolution is generally inadequate for localization of pathology. Combining PET with a high-resolution anatomic imaging modality such as CT can resolve the localization issue, as long as the images from the two modalities are accurately coregistered. However, software-based registration techniques have difficulty accounting for differences in patient positioning and involuntary movement of internal organs, often necessitating labor-intensive nonlinear mapping that may not converge to a satisfactory result. Acquiring both CT and PET images in the same scanner obviates the need for software registration and routinely provides accurately aligned images of anatomy and function in a single scan. DISCUSSION: A CT scanner positioned in tandem with a PET scanner and with a common patient couch and operating console has recently been explored as a solution to anatomic and functional image registration. Axial translation of the couch between the two modalities enables both CT and PET data to be acquired during a single imaging session. In addition, the CT images can be used to generate noiseless attenuation correction factors for the PET emission data. By minimizing patient movement between the CT and PET scans, and after accounting for the axial separation of the two modalities, accurately registered anatomic and functional images can be obtained. Since the introduction of the first PET/CT prototype a little over 5 years ago, several thousand cancer patients have been scanned on combined PET/CT devices. In the past 3 years, a number of commercial designs have become available featuring multidetector spiral CT scanners and high-performance PET devices. Initial experience has demonstrated an increased level of accuracy and confidence in the interpretation of the combined study compared with separate readings, particularly in the ability to distinguish pathology from normal physiologic uptake and to precisely localize abnormal foci.
CONCLUSION: Combined PET/CT scanners represent an important evolution in technology that is helping to bring molecular imaging to the forefront in cancer diagnosis, staging, and therapy monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  72 in total

1.  Automatic detection and classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma on PET/CT with support vector machine.

Authors:  Bangxian Wu; Pek-Lan Khong; Tao Chan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  [Principles of PET/CT and clinical application].

Authors:  A Bockisch; T Beyer; G Antoch; P Veit; S Müller; R Pink; S Rosenbaum; H Kühl
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Putting 'clear' into nuclear medicine: a decade of PET/CT development.

Authors:  Thomas Beyer; David W Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Emerging imaging techniques.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Ay; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging.

Authors:  Patrick L Chow; David B Stout; Evangelia Komisopoulou; Arion F Chatziioannou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Fast analytical approach of application specific dose efficient spectrum selection for diagnostic CT imaging and PET attenuation correction.

Authors:  Xue Rui; Yannan Jin; Paul F FitzGerald; Mingye Wu; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan; Bruno De Man
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 8.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  68Ga-DOTANOC: biodistribution and dosimetry in patients affected by neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  C Pettinato; A Sarnelli; M Di Donna; S Civollani; C Nanni; G Montini; D Di Pierro; M Ferrari; M Marengo; C Bergamini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven?

Authors:  Ciprian Catana; Alexander R Guimaraes; Bruce R Rosen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.