Literature DB >> 14736774

A 12 week study comparing the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the concomitant use of the individual components in patients with open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

M Diestelhorst1, L-I Larsson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect and safety of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with that of the concomitant use of the individual components.
METHODS: A 12 week, double masked, randomised, crossover, multicentre study of patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and IOP controlled on ocular hypotensive treatment (mean < or =21 mmHg). Patients received either a once daily morning dose of the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% or once daily evening latanoprost 0.005% and twice daily timolol 0.5% for six weeks and then switched to the other combination. The primary efficacy endpoint was the within-patient difference in diurnal IOP between fixed and unfixed treatment combinations after six weeks of treatment; a one sided 97.5% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference in IOP <1.0 mmHg indicated the fixed combination was not inferior to the unfixed combination. Adverse events were recorded at each visit.
RESULTS: In all, 190 patients were included in observed cases analyses (93 fixed to unfixed combination; 97 unfixed to fixed combination). Mean IOP at baseline was 16.9 mmHg in both groups. The mean diurnal IOP was 17.0 mmHg after fixed combination treatment and 15.9 mmHg after unfixed combination therapy (p<0.0001). The difference in mean within-patient diurnal IOP was 1.1 mmHg favouring the unfixed combination (95% CI 0.8 to 1.4 mmHg). Both treatments were tolerated well.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met, once daily administration of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol was found to be safe and effective. The fixed combination provides a convenient alternative to the three instillations required with the individual components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736774      PMCID: PMC1771993          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.018234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with its individual components.

Authors:  Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  56,000 ways to treat glaucoma.

Authors:  Tony Realini; Robert D Fechtner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Timolol and facility of outflow.

Authors:  T J Zimmerman; R Harbin; M Pett; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  [Glaucoma patients treated by practicing ophthalmologists in Denmark. Estimated number of patients and the extent of visual field defects].

Authors:  L U Lundberg; J Thygesen; L Damgaard-Jensen; L Serup; S V Kessing
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2000-05-22

5.  A short term study of the additive effect of timolol and brimonidine on intraocular pressure.

Authors:  M K Arici; M Sayici; Mi Toker; H Erdoğan; A Topalkara
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  A comparison of once-daily morning vs evening dosing of concomitant latanoprost/timolol.

Authors:  Anastasios G P Konstas; Elias Nakos; Ioannis Tersis; Nikolaos A Lallos; Jessica N Leech; William C Stewart
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of latanoprost monotherapy versus latanoprost or pilocarpine in combination with timolol: a randomized, observer-masked multicenter study in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Italian Latanoprost Study Group.

Authors:  M G Bucci
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Timolol. A beta-adrenergic blocking agent for the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  T J Zimmerman; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1977-04

Review 9.  Combined therapy of pilocarpine or latanoprost with timolol versus latanoprost monotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Diestelhorst; Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Carol B Toris
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.048

10.  Latanoprost and timolol combination therapy vs monotherapy: one-year randomized trial.

Authors:  Eve J Higginbotham; Robert Feldman; Michael Stiles; Harvey Dubiner
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-07
View more
  17 in total

1.  Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination.

Authors:  Eric Sellem; Jean François Rouland; Christophe Baudouin; Alain Bron; Philippe Denis; Jean-Philippe Nordmann; Jean Paul Renard
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.209

2.  Fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol vs the individual components for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Xing; Fa-Gang Jiang; Teng Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications.

Authors:  Eve J Higginbotham
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-02

4.  Long-term effect of latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a prospective, observational, noninterventional study.

Authors:  Oliver Schwenn; Barbara Heckmann; Claudia Guzy; Paul J Miller
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Short term efficacy and safety in glaucoma patients changed to the latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination from monotherapies and adjunctive therapies.

Authors:  T Hamacher; M Schinzel; A Schölzel-Klatt; H-M Neff; H Maier; G Schlaffer; E Beausencourt; M Jütte; R Scholz; C Lorger; W C Stewart
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Clinical options for the reduction of elevated intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Laura Crawley; Sohaib M Zamir; Maria F Cordeiro; Li Guo
Journal:  Ophthalmol Eye Dis       Date:  2012-04-30

Review 7.  Intraocular pressure-lowering combination therapies with prostaglandin analogues.

Authors:  Florent Aptel; Christophe Chiquet; Jean-Paul Romanet
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.431

8.  Comparative efficacy and safety of the fixed versus unfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Jia-Liang Zhao; Jian Ge; Xiao-Xin Li; Yu-Min Li; Yao-Hua Sheng; Nai-Xue Sun; Xing-Huai Sun; Ke Yao; Zheng Zhong
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  Assessment of ocular hypotensive effect and safety 12 months after changing from an unfixed combination to a latanoprost 0.005% + timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination.

Authors:  Kenji Inoue; Ryoko Okayama; Risako Higa; Masato Wakakura; Goji Tomita
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-18

10.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials for major prostaglandins: a systematic survey of the ophthalmology literature.

Authors:  Oghenowede Eyawo; Chia-Wen Lee; Beth Rachlis; Edward J Mills
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.