Literature DB >> 12036665

A comparison of once-daily morning vs evening dosing of concomitant latanoprost/timolol.

Anastasios G P Konstas1, Elias Nakos, Ioannis Tersis, Nikolaos A Lallos, Jessica N Leech, William C Stewart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate morning vs evening once daily concomitant latanoprost 0.005%/timolol maleate 0.5% therapy in ocular hypertensive or primary open-angle glaucoma patients.
DESIGN: Prospective single-center double-masked crossover comparison.
METHODS: Patients who responded to timolol maleate 0.5% given twice daily were randomized to either evening or morning dosing of concomitant latanoprost 0.005% and timolol maleate 0.5% therapy for 7 weeks. Twenty-four hour diurnal curve intraocular pressure (IOP) testing was performed following each period.
RESULTS: Thirty-six patients completed this study. There was a significant reduction at each time point in the 24-hour diurnal curve of both evening (17.1 +/- 2.7 mm Hg) and morning (17.3 +/- 3.1 mm Hg) dosed latanoprost/timolol maleate compared with timolol maleate given twice daily (21.1 +/- 3.3 mm Hg) (P <.0001). When the morning and evening dosing groups were compared directly, the 06:00 time point was statistically lower with evening dosing (16.4 +/- 2.3 mm Hg) vs morning dosing (17.9 +/- 2.8 mm Hg) (P =.01). Overall, a trend existed for greater daytime reduction with night-time dosing of the concomitant therapy, whereas morning dosing tended to give lower night-time pressures. There was a significantly lower mean range of diurnal pressure with evening (3.6 mm Hg) vs morning (4.3 mm Hg) dosing (P =.02). No differences in adverse events existed between the treated arms.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that latanoprost and timolol maleate, both given once daily in the morning or evening, effectively reduce the IOP for the 24-hour diurnal curve when compared with timolol maleate twice daily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12036665     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01460-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  13 in total

Review 1.  Tafluprost/Timolol: A Review in Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Intraocular pressure control with latanoprost/timolol and travoprost/timolol fixed combinations : a retrospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Philippe Denis; Antoine Lafuma; Viviane Jeanbat; Caroline Laurendeau; Gilles Berdeaux
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  The importance of eyelid closure and nasolacrimal occlusion following the ocular instillation of topical glaucoma medications, and the need for the universal inclusion of one of these techniques in all patient treatments and clinical studies.

Authors:  Allan J Flach
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

4.  A 12 week study comparing the fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol with the concomitant use of the individual components in patients with open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  M Diestelhorst; L-I Larsson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Use of fixed-dose combination drugs for the treatment of glaucoma.

Authors:  Albert S Khouri; Tony Realini; Robert D Fechtner
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 6.  Pharmacological management of primary open-angle glaucoma: second-line options and beyond.

Authors:  Carroll A B Webers; Henny J M Beckers; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Jan S A G Schouten
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Comparative efficacy and safety of the fixed versus unfixed combination of latanoprost and timolol in Chinese patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Jia-Liang Zhao; Jian Ge; Xiao-Xin Li; Yu-Min Li; Yao-Hua Sheng; Nai-Xue Sun; Xing-Huai Sun; Ke Yao; Zheng Zhong
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  A 6-month study comparing efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% versus each of its individual preservative-free components.

Authors:  Norbert Pfeiffer; Carlo E Traverso; Katrin Lorenz; Ville Saarela; Johanna Liinamaa; Hannu Uusitalo; Yury Astakhov; Ernest Boiko; Auli Ropo
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  24-h Efficacy of Glaucoma Treatment Options.

Authors:  Anastasios G P Konstas; Luciano Quaranta; Banu Bozkurt; Andreas Katsanos; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Luca Rossetti; Tarek Shaarawy; Norbert Pfeiffer; Stefano Miglior
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials for major prostaglandins: a systematic survey of the ophthalmology literature.

Authors:  Oghenowede Eyawo; Chia-Wen Lee; Beth Rachlis; Edward J Mills
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.