Literature DB >> 14736579

Attention to motion enhances processing of both visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related potential study.

Anton L Beer1, Brigitte Röder.   

Abstract

The present event-related potential (ERP) study investigated whether attending to a particular direction of motion similarly enhances the processing of auditory and visual stimuli. ERPs were recorded while participants perceived horizontally moving visual and auditory stimuli. Attention was manipulated by asking participants to detect an infrequent target stimulus that was of a specified modality (either visual or auditory) and that moved in a specified direction (either leftward or rightward). Stimuli moving in the attended direction elicited ERPs that were more negative than ERPs to stimuli moving in the unattended direction. This difference started around 140 ms post stimulus onset for visual and around 120 ms for auditory stimuli. The auditory effect had a frontal scalp topography, whereas the visual effect was distributed parieto-occipitally. Later parts of the difference waves were maximal at centro-parietal electrodes for both modalities. Crossmodal effects of attention to motion from one modality to the other could not be detected. The results are discussed with regard to hierarchical models of attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14736579     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  9 in total

1.  Unimodal and crossmodal effects of endogenous attention to visual and auditory motion.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of feature-based attention spread: evidence from combined electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings.

Authors:  Christian Michael Stoppel; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Hendrik Strumpf; Ruth Marie Krebs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens-Max Hopf; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Motion-onset auditory-evoked potentials critically depend on history.

Authors:  Ramona Grzeschik; Martin Böckmann-Barthel; Roland Mühler; Michael B Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Multisensory perceptual learning reshapes both fast and slow mechanisms of crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Melissa A Batson; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Attentional modulations of audiovisual interactions in apparent motion: Temporal ventriloquism effects on perceived visual speed.

Authors:  Aysun Duyar; Andrea Pavan; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Neural suppression of irrelevant information underlies optimal working memory performance.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  3D surface perception from motion involves a temporal-parietal network.

Authors:  Anton L Beer; Takeo Watanabe; Rui Ni; Yuka Sasaki; George J Andersen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Visual evoked potentials to change in coloration of a moving bar.

Authors:  Carolina Murd; Kairi Kreegipuu; Nele Kuldkepp; Aire Raidvee; Maria Tamm; Jüri Allik
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A P300-based brain-computer interface with stimuli on moving objects: four-session single-trial and triple-trial tests with a game-like task design.

Authors:  Ilya P Ganin; Sergei L Shishkin; Alexander Y Kaplan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.