Literature DB >> 14734449

Quantitative analysis of biomarkers defines an optimal biological dose for recombinant human endostatin in primary human tumors.

Darren W Davis1, Yu Shen, Nizar A Mullani, Sijin Wen, Roy S Herbst, Michael O'Reilly, James L Abbruzzese, David J McConkey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In a recent study, we presented preliminary evidence for biological activity in a Phase I dose-finding study (15-600 mg/m(2)) of recombinant human endostatin in patients with refractory solid tumors. Here, we conducted additional biomarker analyses to correlate changes in tumor biology with dose. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Excisional tumor biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 56 days of endostatin therapy. Laser scanning cytometry (LSC) was used to quantify biomarker levels in whole tissue sections. Apoptosis in tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-associated endothelial cells (ECs) was quantified by fluorescent three-color anti-CD31/terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling staining. Microvessel densities were measured by LSC-guided vessel contouring. Levels of tumor-associated EC BCL-2 and hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha were determined by immunofluorescence and LSC quantification. The results, including tumor blood flow measured by positron emission tomography, were analyzed using a quadratic polynomial model.
RESULTS: Significant increases in EC death and decreases in tumor microvessel density were observed, with maximal effects of endostatin at a dose of 249 mg/m(2) (95% confidence interval, 159-338) and 257 mg/m(2) (95% confidence interval, 183-331), respectively. In contrast, levels of TC death were uniformly low and did not correlate with endostatin dose. Maximal nuclear hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha and minimal EC Bcl-2 levels were observed at approximately 250 mg/m(2), although the changes did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that endostatin had optimal biological activity at doses approximately 250 mg/m(2) in our cohort of patients. Endostatin's failure to induce high levels of TC death may explain its lack of significant clinical activity in this Phase I trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14734449     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-0736-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  8 in total

1.  Burdensome Research Procedures in Trials: Why Less Is More.

Authors:  Jonathan Kimmelman; David B Resnik; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  The radiosensitization effects of Endostar on human lung squamous cancer cells H-520.

Authors:  Zhen Y You; Yong Zhao; Feng Liu; Ying D Zhang; Jun J Wang
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  Quantitation of spatial and temporal variability of biomarkers for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  J Nwachokor; O Tawfik; M Danley; S Mathur; J House; P Sharma; L K Christenson; A Bansal
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 4.  Drug resistance associated with antiangiogenesis therapy.

Authors:  Hans Petter Eikesdal; Raghu Kalluri
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Endostatin expression in a pancreatic cell line is modulated by a TNFalpha-dependent elastase.

Authors:  R D Brammer; S R Bramhall; M C Eggo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  The clinical potential of antiangiogenic fragments of extracellular matrix proteins.

Authors:  A R Clamp; G C Jayson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in advanced pancreatic cancer: results of two phase II studies.

Authors:  Milind M Javle; Rachna T Shroff; Henry Xiong; Gauri A Varadhachary; David Fogelman; Shrikanth A Reddy; Darren Davis; Yujian Zhang; Robert A Wolff; James L Abbruzzese
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Potential relevance of bell-shaped and u-shaped dose-responses for the therapeutic targeting of angiogenesis in cancer.

Authors:  Andrew R Reynolds
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.658

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.