Literature DB >> 14733486

Appetitive latent inhibition in rats: now you see it (sign tracking), now you don't (goal tracking).

Robert L Boughner1, Mauricio R Papini.   

Abstract

Latent inhibition (LI), the retardation of Pavlovian acquisition after nonreinforced preexposure to the conditioned stimulus, is a popular paradigm for studying basic attentional and memory processes from both behavioral and neurobiological perspectives. It is argued that whether LI emerges depends on the behavioral measure used to index conditioning. An experiment with rats demonstrates that stimulus preexposure retards the development of sign-tracking responses directed at the stimulus, but not the development of goal-tracking responses directed at the site of food delivery. These results are consistent with models that explain LI in terms of a deficit in retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14733486     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  17 in total

Review 1.  Associative deficit accounts of disrupted latent inhibition and blocking in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Martha Escobar; Philippe Oberling; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Topography of spatially directed conditioned responding: effects of context and trial duration.

Authors:  M Burns; M Domjan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-07

3.  Lever-contact responses in rats: automaintenance with and without a negative response-reinforcer dependency.

Authors:  M Stiers; A Silberberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Autoshaping in the rat: Effects of omission on the form of the response.

Authors:  G C Davey; D Oakley; G G Cleland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  R A Rescorla
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task.

Authors:  I Baruch; D R Hemsley; J A Gray
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Amygdala central nucleus lesions disrupt increments, but not decrements, in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 8.  Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.

Authors:  M E Bouton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior.

Authors:  B F Skinner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Basal forebrain cholinergic lesions disrupt increments but not decrements in conditioned stimulus processing.

Authors:  A A Chiba; D J Bucci; P C Holland; M Gallagher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to reward-related cues: Implications for addiction.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 5.250

2.  Translations in Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing: Autoshaping of Learner Vocalizations.

Authors:  Stephanie P da Silva; April Michele Williams
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-11-25

3.  Stimulus preexposure speeds or slows subsequent acquisition of associative learning depending on learning test procedures and response measure.

Authors:  Peter C Holland
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.986

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.