Literature DB >> 14733472

Restorative cost savings related to dental sealants in Alabama Medicaid children.

Ananda P Dasanayake1, Yufeng Li, Katharine Kirk, Janet Bronstein, Noel K Childers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since properly placed and retained sealants can reduce the incidence of caries lesions and save subsequent restorative costs, the purpose of this study was to compare the subsequent restorative cost in a group of predominantly African American Medicaid children who received prior sealants to that of a group of children who did not receive sealants.
METHODS: Dental claims of 2 cohorts of 5- to 7-year-old children who were continuously enrolled in Alabama Medicaid from 1990 to 1997 (N=9,549) and who either did or did not receive sealants were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics, chi-square and t tests, and regression analysis. The subsequent restorative care costs related to 1-surface posterior amalgam or resin restorations were evaluated in relation to sealant status and selected independent variables.
RESULTS: Only 10% of the children with at least 1 prior sealant claim obtained subsequent 1-surface posterior amalgam or resin restorations. This proportion was 33% among children without a prior sealant claim (OR=4.2, 95% CI=3.6-4.9). On average, total Medicaid reimbursement per child for sealants, plus subsequent restorative care was 56 dollars in the sealant group compared to 72 dollars for subsequent care alone in the nonsealant group. This difference was independent of the child's race, gender, or age.
CONCLUSIONS: As expected, children who do not receive sealants are more likely to obtain subsequent restorative care and cost more money to the health care system. However, the modest sealant-related subsequent restorative cost savings observed among Alabama Medicaid children may be an underestimate of the real cost-benefits of sealants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14733472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  6 in total

1.  School-Based Dental Sealant Programs Prevent Cavities And Are Cost-Effective.

Authors:  Susan Griffin; Shillpa Naavaal; Christina Scherrer; Paul M Griffin; Kate Harris; Sajal Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Preventive Dental Care and Long-Term Dental Outcomes among ALL Kids Enrollees.

Authors:  Bisakha Sen; Justin Blackburn; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; David J Becker; Cathy Caldwell; Nir Menachemi
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Increasing value, reducing waste: tailoring the application of dental sealants according to individual caries risk.

Authors:  Alfa Yansane; Stefan Listl; Dyutee Dawda; Ryan Brandon; Joel White; Heiko Spallek; Muhammad F Walji; Elsbeth Kalenderian
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.821

Review 4.  Evaluation of School-Based Dental Sealant Programs: An Updated Community Guide Systematic Economic Review.

Authors:  Susan O Griffin; Shillpa Naavaal; Christina Scherrer; Mona Patel; Sajal Chattopadhyay
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Estimating the Cost Savings of Preventive Dental Services Delivered to Medicaid-Enrolled Children in Six Southeastern States.

Authors:  Ilbin Lee; Sean Monahan; Nicoleta Serban; Paul M Griffin; Scott L Tomar
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Does the Registered Dentists' Program Alleviate the Socioeconomic Gap in the Use of Dental Sealants?

Authors:  Ji-Eun Jeon; A-Rang Lim; Hyang-Ah Park; Jae-In Ryu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.