Literature DB >> 14731178

Effect of GBR and fixture installation on gingiva and bone levels at adjacent teeth.

Erwin Van der Zee1, Paul Oosterveld, Marinus A J Van Waas.   

Abstract

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is frequently used in oral implantology. It is unclear to what extent GBR affects the periodontium of adjacent teeth. Therefore, the present study quantifies changes in the proximal gingiva and bone levels at these teeth in 30 patients. Staged surgery involved a standard GBR treatment, randomly using resorbable membranes with a bone substitute or non-resorbable membranes with or without a bone substitute, followed by fixture installation at 6 months and abutment connection a further 6 months later. The data were sampled at each surgery and analysed using MANOVA. Twelve months after GBR, there was on average a small but statistically significant amount of proximal gingival recession (0.75 mm) and bone resorption (0.34 mm) observed, of which 50% was the result of GBR surgery. No significant differences were found between the different GBR treatment modalities. It is concluded that GBR treatment may have a small negative effect on the levels of the free gingival margin and alveolar bone at adjacent teeth, which is in most patients not clinically relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14731178     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01005.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  8 in total

Review 1.  Flapless dental implant surgery and use of cone beam computer tomography guided surgery.

Authors:  D P Laverty; J Buglass; A Patel
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  In vivo Comparison of Crestal Bone Heights Following Implant Placement with "Flapless" and "Flap" Techniques in the Sites of Early Loaded Implants.

Authors:  Suhani Kukreja Pahuja; Pooja Negi; Anjali Singh; Gangesh Bahadur Singh; Deepa Rayast; Manisha Minz
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

Review 3.  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Pietro Felice; Georgios Karatzopoulos; Helen V Worthington; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

4.  Dimensional change of the healed periosteum on surgically created defects.

Authors:  Eun-Hee Cho; Jung-Chul Park; Jae-Kook Cha; Yong-Tae Kim; Ui-Won Jung; Chang-Sung Kim; Seong-Ho Choi; Chong-Kwan Kim
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  The efficacy of flapless implant surgery on soft-tissue profile comparing immediate loading implants to delayed loading implants: A comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Deepak Moses Ravindran; Uma Sudhakar; T Ramakrishnan; N Ambalavanan
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2010-10

6.  A survey of the satisfaction of patients who have undergone implant surgery with and without employing a computer-guided implant surgical template.

Authors:  Shin-Young Youk; Jee-Ho Lee; Ji-Man Park; Seong-Joo Heo; Hyun-Ki Roh; Eun-Jin Park; Im Hee Shin
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 7.  Clinical parameters of implants placed in healed sites using flapped and flapless techniques: A systematic review.

Authors:  O Llamas-Monteagudo; P Girbés-Ballester; J Viña-Almunia; D Peñarrocha-Oltra; M Peñarrocha-Diago
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Clinical Evaluation of Placement of Implant by Flapless Technique Over Conventional Flap Technique.

Authors:  T K Divakar; Sundaram Gidean Arularasan; M Baskaran; I Packiaraj; N Dhineksh Kumar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2019-03-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.