Literature DB >> 14730439

Variation of endplate thickness in the cervical spine.

T Pitzen1, B Schmitz, T Georg, D Barbier, T Beuter, W I Steudel, W Reith.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate possible variation of thickness of the cervical spine endplate with respect to endplate orientation (superior or inferior endplate) and level distribution (C4-C7). Six human cervical spine segments C4-C7 were used to create six specimen of C4, C5, C6, and C7, respectively. The bony endplates of each vertebra were cleaned carefully from disc tissue without damaging the endplates. Six endplates with severe degenerative changes were excluded from the study. The posterior elements were removed, and a midaxial cut using a bone saw was performed through each vertebral body, thus producing a superior and inferior half. Each half-vertebra was then glued onto a piece of wood with the endplate oriented upwards and horizontally. For each specimen, four computed tomography scans were taken and thickness of the endplate was measured at five points on each scan perpendicular to the midaxial cut. Factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Scheffe-test were used to detect significant differences. All peripheral regions were significantly thicker than the central point of the endplate if all measuring points were considered for statistical analysis, regardless of scan, endplate orientation or level (Scheffe-test, P<0.001). In both superior and inferior endplates, peripheral areas were thicker than the central region (Scheffe-test, P<0.001). For all levels, the endplate within the peripheral regions was thicker than within the central region and the difference reached significance for the superior and inferior endplate of C4, C5, and C6 and the inferior endplate of C7 (Scheffe-test, P<0.05). The peripheral regions of the cervical spine endplate are usually thicker than its central region, regardless of endplate orientation and level (C4, C5, C6, C7) distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14730439      PMCID: PMC3468129          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0648-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Effect of implant design and endplate preparation on the compressive strength of interbody fusion constructs.

Authors:  T Steffen; A Tsantrizos; M Aebi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Primary stabilizing effect of interbody fusion devices for the cervical spine: an in vitro comparison between three different cage types and bone cement.

Authors:  H J Wilke; A Kettler; L Claes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The cortical shell architecture of human cervical vertebral bodies.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; N C Chen; E K Shin; J L Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates.

Authors:  J P Grant; T R Oxland; M F Dvorak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Biomechanical analysis of thoracolumbar interbody constructs. How important is the endplate?

Authors:  J P Hollowell; D G Vollmer; C R Wilson; F A Pintar; N Yoganandan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  T H Lim; H Kwon; C H Jeon; J G Kim; M Sokolowski; R Natarajan; H S An; G B Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Complications following iliac crest bone grafting.

Authors:  D A Kuhn; M S Moreland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate.

Authors:  M J Silva; C Wang; T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Initial stability of cervical spine fixation: predictive value of a finite element model. Technical note.

Authors:  Tobias R Pitzen; Dieter Matthis; Dragos D Barbier; Wolf-Ingo Steudel
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Anterior plate fixation of traumatic lesions of the lower cervical spine.

Authors:  J C de Oliveira
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Effects of a new anatomical adaptive titanium mesh cage on supportive load at the cervical endplate: a morphological and biomechanical study].

Authors:  Teng Lu; Zhongyang Gao; Xijing He; Jialiang Li; Ning Liu; Hui Liang; Yibin Wang; Zhijing Wen; Ting Zhang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-04-30

2.  Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location.

Authors:  William J Anderst; Tyler West; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions.

Authors:  Hang Feng; Haoxi Li; Zhaoyu Ba; Zhaoxiong Chen; Xinhua Li; Desheng Wu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Measuring the thickness of vertebral endplate and shell using digital tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Michael R Dix; Angela Xiao; Daniel J Oravec; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  The distribution of mineral density in the cervical vertebral endplates.

Authors:  Magdalena Müller-Gerbl; Stefan Weißer; Ulrich Linsenmeier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Mechanisms of Cervical Spine Disc Injury under Cyclic Loading.

Authors:  Sagar Umale; Narayan Yoganandan
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-09-10

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of cervical disc replacement with a novel prosthesis based on the physiological curvature of endplate.

Authors:  Jigang Lou; Yuanchao Li; Beiyu Wang; Yang Meng; Quan Gong; Hao Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.