Literature DB >> 14729789

Is Mobitz type I atrioventricular block benign in adults?

D B Shaw1, J I Gowers, C A Kekwick, K H J New, A W T Whistance.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for pacing in adults with chronic Mobitz type I second degree atrioventricular block (Mobitz I).
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: District general hospital. PATIENTS: 147 subjects aged > or = 20 years (age cohorts 20-44, 45-64, 65-79, and > or = 80) with chronic Mobitz I without second degree Mobitz II or third degree (higher degree) block on entry, seen from 1968 to 1993 and followed up to 30 June 1997. Sixty four had organic heart disease. The presence of symptomatic bradycardia was defined as highly likely in 47 patients (class 1); probable in 14 (class 2); and absent in 86 (class 3).
INTERVENTIONS: Pacemakers were implanted in 90 patients for the following indications: symptoms in 74 and prophylaxis in 16. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was death, with conduction deterioration to higher degree block or symptomatic bradycardia the alternative measure.
RESULTS: Five year survival to death was reduced in unpaced patients relative to that expected for the normal population (overall mean (SD) 53.5 (6.7)% v 68.6%, p < 0.001; class 3, 54.4 (7.3)% v 70.1%, p < 0.001). Paced patients fared better than unpaced (overall (mean (SD) five year survival 76.3 (4.5)% v 53.5 (6.7)%, p = 0.0014; class 3, 87.2 (5.4)% v 54.4 (7.3)%, p = 0.020; and organic heart disease, 68.2 (7.6)% v 44.0 (9.9)%, p < or = 0.0014). There were no deaths in the < 45 cohort. Survival to first outcome (main or alternative) was further reduced to 31.7 (5.0)% in 102 patients unpaced initially and 34.2 (5.7)% in class 3. Only the 20-44 cohort and patients with sinus arrhythmia had > 50% survival.
CONCLUSION: Mobitz I block is not usually benign in patients > or = 45 years of age. Pacemaker implantation should be considered, even in the absence of symptomatic bradycardia or organic heart disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14729789      PMCID: PMC1768048          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2003.017806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  31 in total

1.  Guidelines: making the headlines or confined to the sidelines?

Authors:  J P Bassand; L Rydén
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Dual-chamber vs ventricular pacing in the elderly: quality of life and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  M Vassolo; G A Lamas
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Survival in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Authors:  M Rosenqvist; R Nordlander
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.213

4.  Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation).

Authors:  L S Dreifus; C Fisch; J C Griffin; P C Gillette; J W Mason; V Parsonnet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-08

6.  Mobitz type I atrioventricular block: an indication for permanent pacing?

Authors:  D T Connelly; D M Steinhaus
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Long-term survival after permanent pacemaker implantation in young adults: 30 year experience.

Authors:  B M Mayosi; F Little; R N Millar
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Effects of sex and age on electrocardiographic and cardiac electrophysiological properties in adults.

Authors:  T Taneja; B W Mahnert; R Passman; J Goldberger; A Kadish
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis of rheumatic fever. Jones Criteria, 1992 update. Special Writing Group of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young of the American Heart Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Cost benefit analysis of single and dual chamber pacing for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. An economic sensitivity analysis of the literature.

Authors:  R Sutton; I Bourgeois
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of arrhythmias and conduction disorders in older adults.

Authors:  Grant V Chow; Joseph E Marine; Jerome L Fleg
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 2.  Evaluation and Management of Asymptomatic Bradyarrhythmias.

Authors:  Göksel Çinier; Sohaib Haseeb; Giorgos Bazoukis; Cynthia Yeung; E Elvin Gül
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021

Review 3.  Vagomimetic effects of fingolimod: physiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Emilio Vanoli; Francesco Pentimalli; Gianluca Botto
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.