Literature DB >> 14728939

Predictive value of rectal bleeding for distal colonic neoplastic lesions in a screened population.

R Ferraris1, C Senore, M Fracchia, S Sciallero, L Bonelli, W S Atkin, N Segnan.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of rectal bleeding for distal colorectal cancer (CRC), or large (> or =10 mm) adenomas among an average-risk population. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among individuals aged 55-64 years, who attended sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening in the context of a multicentre randomised trial of FS screening for CRC. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of rectal bleeding for large distal adenomas or CRC were calculated. Rectal bleeding was reported by 8.8% of 8507 patients examined (15% of those with large adenomas and 29% of those with CRC). The risk of CRC was increased when bleeding was associated with an altered bowel habit: odds ratio (OR)=10.42; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.08-26.59; the corresponding OR for isolated bleeding was 5.29 (95% CI: 2.28-12.30). Rectal bleeding carries an increased risk of distal neoplastic lesions. However, most lesions are detected among asymptomatic subjects. This finding suggests that screening represents the optimal strategy to detect CRC or large adenomas in the distal colon in the targeted age range.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14728939     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  6 in total

1.  Outliving colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Ken Flegel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.

Authors:  William G Paterson; William T Depew; Pierre Paré; Denis Petrunia; Connie Switzer; Sander J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; Sandra Daniels
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Most bowel cancer symptoms do not indicate colorectal cancer and polyps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara-Ann Adelstein; Petra Macaskill; Siew F Chan; Peter H Katelaris; Les Irwig
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database.

Authors:  Roger Jones; Radoslav Latinovic; Judith Charlton; Martin C Gulliford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-05-10

5.  History of negative colorectal endoscopy and risk of rectosigmoid neoplasms at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Authors:  Luigina Bonelli; Stefania Sciallero; Carlo Senore; Marco Zappa; Hugo Aste; Bruno Andreoni; Donato Angioli; Roberto Ferraris; Stefano Gasperoni; Giuseppe Malfitana; Marco Pennazio; Wendy Atkin; Nereo Segnan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Detection of cancers and advanced adenomas in asymptomatic participants in colorectal cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Lisa Schult; Edoardo Botteri; Geir Hoff; Kristin R Randel; Eirin Dalén; Sigrun Losada Eskeland; Øyvind Holme; Thomas de Lange
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.