Literature DB >> 14728782

Competition and predation in simple food webs: intermediately strong trade-offs maximize coexistence.

Reinier HilleRisLambers1, Ulf Dieckmann.   

Abstract

Competition and predation are fundamental interactions structuring food webs. However, rather than always following these neat theoretical categories, mixed interactions are ubiquitous in nature. Of particular importance are omnivorous species, such as intra-guild predators that can both compete with and predate on their prey. Here, we examine trade-offs between competitive and predatory capacities by analysing the entire continuum of food web configurations existing between purely predator-prey and purely competitive interactions of two consumers subsisting on a single resource. Our results show that the range of conditions allowing for coexistence of the consumers is maximized at intermediately strong trade-offs. Even though coexistence under weak trade-offs and under very strong trade-offs is also possible, it occurs under much more restrictive conditions. We explain these findings by an intricate interplay between energy acquisition and interaction strength.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728782      PMCID: PMC1691548          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  6 in total

Review 1.  The diversity-stability debate.

Authors:  K S McCann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-05-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effects of Enrichment on Three-Level Food Chains with Omnivory.

Authors:  Sebastian Diehl; Margit Feißel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability.

Authors:  V Krivan
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.570

4.  Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops.

Authors:  Anje-Margriet Neutel; Johan A P Heesterbeek; Peter C De Ruiter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability.

Authors:  M R Gardner; W R Ashby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-11-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time.

Authors:  M L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-01-29       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Intraguild predation between phytoseiid mite species might not be so common.

Authors:  C Guzmán; R M Sahún; M Montserrat
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Distribution and oviposition site selection by predatory mites in the presence of intraguild predators.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Cues of intraguild predators affect the distribution of intraguild prey.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Choh; Tessa van der Hammen; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  How to evaluate the potential occurrence of intraguild predation.

Authors:  Morgana Maria Fonseca; Marta Montserrat; Celeste Guzmán; Inmaculada Torres-Campos; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.132

5.  Are trade-offs among species' ecological interactions scale dependent? A test using pitcher-plant inquiline species.

Authors:  Jamie M Kneitel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reciprocal intraguild predation and predator coexistence.

Authors:  Renata Vieira Marques; Renato Almeida Sarmento; Adriana Gonçalves Oliveira; Diego de Macedo Rodrigues; Madelaine Venzon; Marçal Pedro-Neto; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  A random survival forest illustrates the importance of natural enemies compared to host plant quality on leaf beetle survival rates.

Authors:  Thomas A Verschut; Peter A Hambäck
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 2.964

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.