Literature DB >> 26715542

Intraguild predation between phytoseiid mite species might not be so common.

C Guzmán1, R M Sahún1, M Montserrat2.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that intraguild predation (IGP) occurs frequently between species of phytoseiid mites. However, in the presence of a shared resource many species of phytoseiid mites considerably reduce, or even cease, predation on each other. That being the case, IGP would then be minimal, or non-existent, and its theoretical effects on communities negligible. The aim of this work was two-fold. On the one hand, we aimed at determining the occurrence of IGP between two species of phytoseiid mites that inhabit avocado agro-ecosystems (Euseius stipulatus and E. scutalis) while considering the influence of abiotic conditions. On the other hand, we aimed at evaluating the occurrence of IGP between species of phytoseiid mites through a literature search of studies to determine whether methodologies and results in these papers supported the extended idea of IGP being widespread in the Phytoseiidae family. Our results suggested that in the presence of the shared resource predation on the IG-prey was negligible and both species seem to forage preferentially on pollen. Therefore, the interaction that most likely drives the dynamics of these two species in the field is exploitative resource competition. The literature search revealed that caution should be taken when assuming that IGP between phytoseiid mites is widespread, because only few works used experimental set ups with the adequate array of treatments allowing to assess whether IG-predators fed or not on both the IG-prey and the shared resource.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abiotic conditions; Climate change; Persea americana; Phytoseiid mites; Pollen

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26715542     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-015-9997-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  24 in total

1.  Cannibalism and intraguild predation in Typhlodromus exhilaratus and T. phialatus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) under laboratory conditions.

Authors:  Anna Meszaros; Marie-Stéphane Tixier; Brigitte Cheval; Ziad Barbar; Serge Kreiter
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Habitat structure affects intraguild predation.

Authors:  Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis; Sara Magalhães; Marta Montserrat; Tessa van der Hammen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Impact of intraguild predation and stage structure on simple communities along a productivity gradient.

Authors:  S D Mylius; K Klumpers; A M de Roos; L Persson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.

Authors:  G A Polis; R D Holt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Intraguild predation and feeding preferences in three species of phytoseiid mite used for biological control.

Authors:  Ian S Hatherly; Jeffrey S Bale; Keith F A Walters
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Cannibalism and intraguild predation among phytoseiid mites: are aggressiveness and prey preference related to diet specialization?

Authors:  P Schausberger; B A Croft
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Intraguild interactions between Euseius stipulatus and the candidate biocontrol agents of Tetranychus urticae in Spanish clementine orchards: Phytoseiulus persimilis and Neoseiulus californicus.

Authors:  Raquel Abad-Moyano; Alberto Urbaneja; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Females as intraguild predators of males in cross-pairing experiments with phytoseiid mites.

Authors:  Nazer Famah Sourassou; Rachid Hanna; Koffi Negloh; Johannes A J Breeuwer; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.132

9.  Factors determining species displacement of related predatory mite species (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Tetsuo Gotoh; Masumi Hanawa; Sayaka Shimazaki; Natsuki Yokoyama; Chun-Qing Fu; Reo Sugawara; Shuichi Yano
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Alternative food improves the combined effect of an omnivore and a predator on biological pest control. A case study in avocado orchards.

Authors:  J J González-Fernández; F de la Peña; J I Hormaza; J R Boyero; J M Vela; E Wong; M M Trigo; M Montserrat
Journal:  Bull Entomol Res       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 1.750

View more
  2 in total

1.  How to evaluate the potential occurrence of intraguild predation.

Authors:  Morgana Maria Fonseca; Marta Montserrat; Celeste Guzmán; Inmaculada Torres-Campos; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Reciprocal intraguild predation and predator coexistence.

Authors:  Renata Vieira Marques; Renato Almeida Sarmento; Adriana Gonçalves Oliveira; Diego de Macedo Rodrigues; Madelaine Venzon; Marçal Pedro-Neto; Angelo Pallini; Arne Janssen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.912

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.