Literature DB >> 14728149

Evaluating the C-section rate of different physician practices: using machine learning to model standard practice.

Rich Caruana1, Radu S Niculescu, R Bharat Rao, Cynthia Simms.   

Abstract

The C-section rate of a population of 22,175 expectant mothers is 16.8%; yet the 17 physician groups that serve this population have vastly different group C-section rates, ranging from 13% to 23%. Our goal is to determine retrospectively if the variations in the observed rates can be attributed to variations in the intrinsic risk of the patient sub-populations (i.e. some groups contain more "high-risk C-section" patients), or differences in physician practice (i.e. some groups do more C-sections). We apply machine learning to this problem by training models to predict standard practice from retrospective data. We then use the models of standard practice to evaluate the C-section rate of each physician practice. Our results indicate that although there is variation in intrinsic risk among the groups, there also is much variation in physician practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14728149      PMCID: PMC1480028     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  3 in total

1.  Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience.

Authors:  P A Poma
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.

Authors:  J L Bailit; S L Dooley; A N Peaceman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Predicting cesarean delivery with decision tree models.

Authors:  C J Sims; L Meyn; R Caruana; R B Rao; T Mitchell; M Krohn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.661

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.