Literature DB >> 11084566

Predicting cesarean delivery with decision tree models.

C J Sims1, L Meyn, R Caruana, R B Rao, T Mitchell, M Krohn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether decision tree-based methods can be used to predict cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a historical cohort study of women delivered of live-born singleton neonates in 1995 through 1997 (22,157). The frequency of cesarean delivery was 17%; 78 variables were used for analysis. Decision tree rule-based methods and logistic regression models were each applied to the same 50% of the sample to develop the predictive training models and these models were tested on the remaining 50%.
RESULTS: Decision tree receiver operating characteristic curve areas were as follows: nulliparous, 0.82; parous, 0.93. Logistic receiver operating characteristic curve areas were as follows: nulliparous, 0.86; parous, 0.93. Decision tree methods and logistic regression methods used similar predictive variables; however, logistic methods required more variables and yielded less intelligible models. Among the 6 decision tree building methods tested, the strict minimum message length criterion yielded decision trees that were small yet accurate. Risk factor variables were identified in 676 nulliparous cesarean deliveries (69%) and 419 parous cesarean deliveries (47.6%).
CONCLUSION: Decision tree models can be used to predict cesarean delivery. Models built with strict minimum message length decision trees have the following attributes: Their performance is comparable to that of logistic regression; they are small enough to be intelligible to physicians; they reveal causal dependencies among variables not detected by logistic regression; they can handle missing values more easily than can logistic methods; they predict cesarean deliveries that lack a categorized risk factor variable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084566     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2000.108891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

Review 1.  Decision trees: an overview and their use in medicine.

Authors:  Vili Podgorelec; Peter Kokol; Bruno Stiglic; Ivan Rozman
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Potential impact of American Diabetes Association (2000) criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Spain.

Authors:  W Ricart; J López; J Mozas; A Pericot; M A Sancho; N González; M Balsells; R Luna; A Cortázar; P Navarro; O Ramírez; B Flández; L F Pallardo; A Hernández; J Ampudia; J M Fernández-Real; R Corcoy
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Evaluating the C-section rate of different physician practices: using machine learning to model standard practice.

Authors:  Rich Caruana; Radu S Niculescu; R Bharat Rao; Cynthia Simms
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  The active management of risk in multiparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

Authors:  James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey; Morghan H Stenson; Peter Cronholm; Lisa Kellar; Ian Bennett; Katie Margo; Joseph Stratton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Clinical Decision Support Trees Can Help Optimize Utilization of Anaplasma phagocytophilum Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing.

Authors:  Robert Hamilton; Torrie R Pandora; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Isabella W Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.