Literature DB >> 14726948

Variability of environmental exposures to volatile organic compounds.

Stephen M Rappaport1, Lawrence L Kupper.   

Abstract

Although studies of occupational exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) often partition variability across groups, and between and within persons, those of environmental exposure to VOCs have not involved such partitioning. Using data from the Environmental Protection Agency's total exposure assessment methodology (TEAM) studies, we partitioned exposure variability across cities, and between and within persons for nine VOCs. The estimated variance components decreased in the order: within-person > between-person > across city. Despite their smaller magnitudes, estimates of between-person and across-city variance components were sufficiently large to provide reasonable contrast for informative epidemiology studies of most VOCs. Estimates of between-person variance components for environmental VOCs were similar to those published for occupational VOCs (groups defined by job and factory). However, estimates of within-person variance components were much greater for environmental VOCs, probably due to the greater diversity of locations (including the workplace) visited by the general public over time. For benzene and perchloroethylene, we used a simple model to calculate numbers of personal measurements required to relate the exposure level to health outcome statistically. About 10 times more personal measurements would be required to investigate perchloroethylene exposure as compared to benzene exposure; this disparity reflects the greater within-subject variability of perchloroethylene data compared to benzene data. We conclude that variability should be partitioned for environmental VOC exposures in much the same manner as for occupational exposures. There should be sufficient variability in the levels of most VOCs across cities and between subjects to provide reasonable contrast for informative epidemiology studies, as we illustrate for exposures to benzene. Yet, epidemiologists should be wary of investigating environmental VOCs without preliminary data with which to estimate the variance structure of exposure variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14726948     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  8 in total

1.  Trends of VOC exposures among a nationally representative sample: Analysis of the NHANES 1988 through 2004 data sets.

Authors:  Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Extreme value analyses of VOC exposures and risks: A comparison of RIOPA and NHANES datasets.

Authors:  Feng-Chiao Su; Chunrong Jia; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Variability of indoor and outdoor VOC measurements: an analysis using variance components.

Authors:  Chunrong Jia; Stuart A Batterman; George E Relyea
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Air samples versus biomarkers for epidemiology.

Authors:  Y S Lin; L L Kupper; S M Rappaport
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Determinants of personal exposure to some carcinogenic substances and nitrogen dioxide among the general population in five Swedish cities.

Authors:  Annika Hagenbjörk-Gustafsson; Andreas Tornevi; Eva M Andersson; Sandra Johannesson; Tom Bellander; Anne-Sophie Merritt; Håkan Tinnerberg; Håkan Westberg; Bertil Forsberg; Gerd Sallsten
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Addressing extrema and censoring in pollutant and exposure data using mixture of normal distributions.

Authors:  Shi Li; Stuart Batterman; Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Relative performance of different exposure modeling approaches for sulfur dioxide concentrations in the air in rural western Canada.

Authors:  Igor Burstyn; Nicola M Cherry; Yutaka Yasui; Hyang-Mi Kim
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Health and household air pollution from solid fuel use: the need for improved exposure assessment.

Authors:  Maggie L Clark; Jennifer L Peel; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Patrick N Breysse; Steven N Chillrud; Luke P Naeher; Charles E Rodes; Alan F Vette; John M Balbus
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.