Literature DB >> 25705112

Extreme value analyses of VOC exposures and risks: A comparison of RIOPA and NHANES datasets.

Feng-Chiao Su1, Chunrong Jia2, Stuart Batterman1.   

Abstract

Extreme value theory, which characterizes the behavior of tails of distributions, is potentially well-suited to model exposures and risks of pollutants. In this application, it emphasizes the highest exposures, particularly those that may be high enough to present acute or chronic health risks. The present study examines extreme value distributions of exposures and risks to volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Exposures of 15 different VOCs were measured in the Relationship between Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study, and ten of the same VOCs were measured in the nationally representative National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Both studies used similar sampling methods and study periods. Using the highest 5 and 10% of measurements, generalized extreme value (GEV), Gumbel and lognormal distributions were fit to each VOC in these two large studies. Health risks were estimated for individual VOCs and three VOC mixtures. Simulated data that matched the three types of distributions were generated and compared to observations to evaluate goodness-of-fit. The tail behavior of exposures, which clearly neither fit normal nor lognormal distributions for most VOCs in RIOPA, was usually best fit by the 3-parameter GEV distribution, and often by the 2-parameter Gumbel distribution. In contrast, lognormal distributions significantly underestimated both the level and likelihood of extrema. Among the RIOPA VOCs, 1,4-dichlorobenzene (1,4-DCB) caused the greatest risks, e.g., for the top 10% extrema, all individuals had risk levels above 10-4, and 13% of them exceeded 10-2. NHANES had considerably higher concentrations of all VOCs with two exceptions, methyl tertiary-butyl ether and 1,4-DCB. Differences between these studies can be explained by sampling design, staging, sample demographics, smoking and occupation. This analysis shows that extreme value distributions can represent peak exposures of VOCs, which clearly are neither normally nor lognormally distributed. These exposures have the greatest health significance, and require accurate modeling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure; Extreme value analysis; RIOPA; Risk; Volatile organic compounds

Year:  2012        PMID: 25705112      PMCID: PMC4334151          DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)        ISSN: 1352-2310            Impact factor:   4.798


  22 in total

1.  Volatile organic pollutants in new and established buildings in Melbourne, Australia.

Authors:  S K Brown
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Relationship of Indoor, Outdoor and Personal Air (RIOPA) study: study design, methods and quality assurance/control results.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel; Junfeng Zhang; Barbara J Turpin; Maria T Morandi; Steven Colome; Thomas H Stock; Dalia M Spektor; Leo Korn; Arthur Winer; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Jaymin Kwon; Krishnan Mohan; Robert Harrington; Robert Giovanetti; William Cui; Masoud Afshar; Silvia Maberti; Derek Shendell
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2005-03

3.  Analysis of multivariate extreme intakes of food chemicals.

Authors:  M J Paulo; H van der Voet; J C Wood; G R Marion; J D van Klaveren
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 4.  Extreme value analysis in biometrics.

Authors:  Jürg Hüsler
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.207

5.  A tool for determining urban emission characteristics to be used in exposure assessment.

Authors:  P Kassomenos; S Lykoudis; A Chaloulakou
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Source proximity and outdoor-residential VOC concentrations: results from the RIOPA study.

Authors:  Jaymin Kwon; Clifford P Weisel; Barbara J Turpin; Junfeng Zhang; Leo R Korn; Maria T Morandi; Thomas H Stock; Steven Colome
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Relationships of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA). Part I. Collection methods and descriptive analyses.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel; Junfeng Zhang; Barbara J Turpin; Maria T Morandi; Steven Colome; Thomas H Stock; Dalia M Spektor; Leo Korn; Arthur M Winer; Jaymin Kwon; Qing Yu Meng; Lin Zhang; Robert Harrington; Weili Liu; Adam Reff; Jong Hoon Lee; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Kishan Mohan; Derek Shendell; Jennifer Jones; L Farrar; Slivia Maberti; Tina Fan
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2005-11

8.  Personal, indoor, and outdoor VOC exposures in a probability sample of children.

Authors:  John L Adgate; Lynn E Eberly; Charles Stroebel; Edo D Pellizzari; Ken Sexton
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2004

9.  Complex mixtures in industrial workspaces: lessons for indoor air quality evaluations.

Authors:  B E Lippy; R W Turner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

1.  Personal exposure to mixtures of volatile organic compounds: modeling and further analysis of the RIOPA data.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Feng-Chiao Su; Shi Li; Bhramar Mukherjee; Chunrong Jia
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2014-06

2.  Modeling and analysis of personal exposures to VOC mixtures using copulas.

Authors:  Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Addressing extrema and censoring in pollutant and exposure data using mixture of normal distributions.

Authors:  Shi Li; Stuart Batterman; Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Experimental outgassing of toxic chemicals to simulate the characteristics of hazards tainting globally shipped products.

Authors:  Lygia Therese Budnik; Nadine Austel; Sabrina Gadau; Stefan Kloth; Jens Schubert; Harald Jungnickel; Andreas Luch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Peak Inhalation Exposure Metrics Used in Occupational Epidemiologic and Exposure Studies.

Authors:  M Abbas Virji; Laura Kurth
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-01-08

6.  Assessing volatile organic compounds exposure and prostate-specific antigen: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2010.

Authors:  Chengcheng Wei; Yumao Chen; Yu Yang; Dong Ni; Yu Huang; Miao Wang; Xiong Yang; Zhaohui Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29

7.  Application of an in Vitro Assay to Identify Chemicals That Increase Estradiol and Progesterone Synthesis and Are Potential Breast Cancer Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bethsaida Cardona; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Mixed POT-BM Approach for Modeling Unhealthy Air Pollution Events.

Authors:  Nurulkamal Masseran; Muhammad Aslam Mohd Safari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.