Literature DB >> 14722035

Phase III study of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy]ethanamine (BMS-217380-01) combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA.19.

Leonard Reyno1, Lesley Seymour, Dongsheng Tu, Susan Dent, Karen Gelmon, Barbara Walley, Anna Pluzanska, Vera Gorbunova, Avgust Garin, Jacek Jassem, Tadeusz Pienkowski, Janet Dancey, Laura Pearce, Mary MacNeil, Susan Marlin, David Lebwohl, Maurizio Voi, Kathleen Pritchard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is a novel agent that augments chemotherapy cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. A phase II trial combining DPPE and doxorubicin (DOX) in metastatic breast carcinoma showed increased response over that expected with DOX. We report a phase III trial comparing DOX with DPPE plus DOX in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anthracycline-naive women with measurable metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive, every 21 days, either DOX 60 mg/m(2) intravenously or DOX during the last 20 minutes of an 80-minute infusion of DPPE (5.3 mg/kg), in both cases to cumulative DOX doses of 450 mg/m(2). Patients receiving DPPE were aggressively premedicated to ameliorate toxicity. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and response duration (RD), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: A planned interim analysis failed to detect an RR difference more than 5%. The study was closed to additional accrual and all DPPE was discontinued. The final analysis was conducted as planned after 256 progression events (median follow-up, 20.5 months). There was no significant difference in RR, RD, or PFS between arms. DPPE plus DOX was statistically superior to DOX in OS (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P =.021). DPPE plus DOX was associated with more gastrointestinal and CNS toxicity. No consistent influence on QOL was detected.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no advantage in RR, RD, or PFS but significantly superior OS for DPPE plus DOX. Additional studies of DPPE are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14722035     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

Review 1.  Filling in the gaps: reporting of concurrent supportive care therapies in breast cancer chemotherapy trials.

Authors:  Orit Freedman; Eitan Amir; Camilla Zimmermann; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Challenges and Potential for Ovarian Preservation with SERMs.

Authors:  Alison Y Ting; Brian K Petroff
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.285

Review 3.  Disrupting P-glycoprotein function in clinical settings: what can we learn from the fundamental aspects of this transporter?

Authors:  Francisco S Chung; Jayson S Santiago; Miguel Francisco M De Jesus; Camille V Trinidad; Melvin Floyd E See
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  The Globalization of Cooperative Groups.

Authors:  Manuel Valdivieso; Benjamin W Corn; Janet E Dancey; D Lawrence Wickerham; L Elise Horvath; Edith A Perez; Alison Urton; Walter M Cronin; Erica Field; Evonne Lackey; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 4.929

5.  Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Ann H Partridge; R Bryan Rumble; Lisa A Carey; Steven E Come; Nancy E Davidson; Angelo Di Leo; Julie Gralow; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Beverly Moy; Douglas Yee; Shelley B Brundage; Michael A Danso; Maggie Wilcox; Ian E Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Prognostic/predictive markers in systemic therapy resistance and metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Evthokia A Hobbs; Natalie Chen; Alphi Kuriakose; Elizabeth Bonefas; Bora Lim
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 5.485

7.  High-level copy number gains of established and potential drug target genes in gastric cancer as a lead for treatment development and selection.

Authors:  Mariette Labots; Tineke E Buffart; Josien C Haan; Nicole C T van Grieken; Marianne Tijssen; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Heike I Grabsch; Bauke Ylstra; Beatriz Carvalho; Remond J A Fijneman; Henk M W Verheul; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 6.730

8.  Farnesyl-transferase inhibitor R115,777 enhances tamoxifen inhibition of MCF-7 cell growth through estrogen receptor dependent and independent pathways.

Authors:  Florence Dalenc; Claire Giamarchi; Mélissa Petit; Marc Poirot; Gilles Favre; Jean-Charles Faye
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  "New" metastases are associated with a poorer prognosis than growth of pre-existing metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Christopher Twelves; Javier Cortes; Peter A Kaufman; Louise Yelle; Ahmad Awada; Terri A Binder; Martin Olivo; James Song; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; Maria Jove; Edith A Perez
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Structurally Divergent Lithium Catalyzed Friedel-Crafts Reactions on Oxetan-3-ols: Synthesis of 3,3-Diaryloxetanes and 2,3-Dihydrobenzofurans.

Authors:  Rosemary A Croft; James J Mousseau; Chulho Choi; James A Bull
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 5.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.