Literature DB >> 14719147

Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery: myth or reality? A prospective ultrasound study of 93 females.

V de Parades1, I Etienney, D Thabut, S Beaulieu, M Tawk, B Assemekang, V Marié, M L Toubia, A Wehbe, H Mosnier, P Gadonneix, T Harvey, P Atienza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to estimate the prevalence of anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery in a large population of females managed by trained obstetricians in a French hospital and to identify factors predictive for anal sphincter injury.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study of healthy females older than 18 years with no history of anal incontinence, anorectal abnormalities, or anorectal surgery after their first vaginal delivery. All females were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire concerning intestinal transit and continence status. Physical examination and endoanal ultrasonography were performed after delivery.
RESULTS: Between November 1999 and November 2000, 93 females were included in the study after their first forceps delivery. Eleven patients (11.8 percent) had a partial defect involving the external sphincter, visible on ultrasonography. One patient (1.1 percent) had a partial defect of external sphincter with complete defect of internal sphincter (sequelae of primary repair of a third-degree perineal tear). Seventeen patients (18.2 percent) had flatus incontinence, and four patients (4.3 percent) had liquid stool incontinence. A high daily number of stools was significantly associated with sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (P=0.02). The development of anal incontinence was not related to sphincter defect on ultrasonography. There was a strong association between perineal tear and sphincter defect visible on ultrasonography (odds ratio, 4.5 (range, 1.2-16.7)).
CONCLUSIONS: Anal sphincter injury after forceps delivery was identified in <13 percent of our large population of healthy females. Our study does not confirm previous observations that anal sphincter injury is common after forceps delivery; previously published studies may have overestimated the prevalence of this condition. The only factor with significant predictive value for anal sphincter injury was perineal tear. Anal endosonography should be recommended after obstetric perineal tear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14719147     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-003-0007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  4 in total

1.  Determinants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous posterior perineal lacerations during vaginal birth.

Authors:  Diaa E E Rizk; Mary N Abadir; Letha B Thomas; Fikri Abu-Zidan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-01-20

2.  The epidemiology of anal incontinence and symptom severity scoring.

Authors:  Avinoam Nevler
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-02-27

Review 3.  Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Adanna Okeahialam; Ka Woon Wong; Swati Jha; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Prevalence of high-grade perineal tear during labor in Mexican adolescents.

Authors:  María Teresa Sánchez-Ávila; Marisol Galván-Caudillo; Jaime Javier Cantú-Pompa; Natalia Vázquez-Romero; Jhanea Patricia Martínez-López; Víctor Manuel Matías-Barrios; Abryl Mariana Avitia-Herrera; Luis Alonso Morales-Garza; Claudia Eugenia Hernández-Escobar; Gonzalo Soto-Fuenzalida; María Teresa González-Garza
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2018-12-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.