Literature DB >> 14716552

Long-term symptoms following endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones.

R C A Macadam1, R J R Goodall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) has an important role in the management of biliary stones. However, the long-term effects of free duodenobiliary reflux are not established, and it may lead to low-grade morbidity.
METHODS: We used a questionnaire survey to assess the prevalence of symptoms of biliary disorder in patients who had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) and ES under the care of a single surgeon (R.J.R.G) between November 1993 and May 1998.
RESULTS: ES was carried out on 136 patients during this period. Current addresses were available for 94 patients, and 54 of them (57%) responded. Patients were surveyed a mean of 43 months after ES. Only 42.1% of patients denied having any symptoms. Nausea and pale stools were reported by 28% and 26% of patients, respectively, and nearly one-fifth of patients had symptoms suggestive of cholangitis. In addition, 18.5% of patients experienced one or more symptoms frequently.
CONCLUSION: Severe long-term symptoms are uncommon following ES; however, a significant minority of patients do suffer occasional symptoms that suggest biliary dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14716552     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9285-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Follow-up 6 to 11 years after duodenoscopic sphincterotomy for stones in patients with prior cholecystectomy.

Authors:  R H Hawes; P B Cotton; A G Vallon
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  [Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of vater and extraction of stones from the choledochal duct (author's transl)].

Authors:  M Classen; L Demling
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 0.628

Review 3.  Endoscopic papillotomy. A clinical and experimental study.

Authors:  A R Rosseland
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 4.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy: follow-up evaluation of effects on the sphincter of Oddi.

Authors:  J E Geenen; J Toouli; W J Hogan; W J Dodds; E T Stewart; P Mavrelis; D Riedel; R Venu
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Gallbladder and duodenal bacterial flora after papillotomy in rabbits.

Authors:  A R Rosseland; T Midtvedt; A O Aasen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J Sand; I Airo; K M Hiltunen; J Mattila; I Nordback
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Long-term follow-up study of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  O Jacobsen; P Matzen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Biliary sequelae of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  C Greenfield; P Cleland; R Dick; S Masters; J A Summerfield; S Sherlock
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Endoscopic papillotomy in patients with gallbladder in situ. Is subsequent cholecystectomy necessary?

Authors:  J H Solhaug; O Fokstuen; A Rosseland; B Rydberg
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1984
View more
  8 in total

1.  [Therapeutic splitting as standard treatment for cholelithiasis].

Authors:  U T Hopt; U Adam
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Thirteen years' experience with laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration for stones. Effectiveness and long-term results.

Authors:  A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; J Sarnari; A De Sanctis; G D'Ambrosio; G Lezoche; S Perretta; E Lezoche
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  E J M van Geenen; D L van der Peet; C J J Mulder; M A Cuesta; M J Bruno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Is laparoscopic fiberoptic choledochoscopy for common bile duct stones a fine option or a mandatory step?

Authors:  R Campagnacci; A Baldoni; M Baldarelli; M Rimini; A De Sanctis; M Di Emiddio; M Guerrieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Risk factors for cholecystectomy in patients with gallbladder stones after endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kang-Moon Lee; Chang Nyol Paik; Woo Chul Chung; Jin Dong Kim; Cheong Rok Lee; Jin Mo Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients: as a first treatment strategy for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Anbok Lee; Seog Ki Min; Jae Jung Park; Hyeon Kook Lee
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2011-08-03

7.  Meta-analysis of single-stage versus two-staged management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Zhi-Qing Li; Ji-Xia Sun; Bin Li; Xue-Qiang Dai; An-Xing Yu; Zhe-Fu Li
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  3D Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary repair by absorbable barbed suture is safe and feasible.

Authors:  Yen Pin Tan; Cheryl Lim; Sameer P Junnarkar; Cheong Wei Terence Huey; Vishalkumar G Shelat
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-07-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.