Literature DB >> 14715841

Relationship between serum gonadotropins and spermatogenic suppression in men undergoing steroidal contraceptive treatment.

Robert I McLachlan1, David M Robertson, Enid Pruysers, Antony Ugoni, Alvin M Matsumoto, Bradley D Anawalt, William J Bremner, Cristina Meriggiola.   

Abstract

This study aimed to establish whether the degree of suppression of serum FSH and LH was related to sperm concentration in three testosterone (T) plus progestin contraceptive regimens. We measured serum FSH and LH using a modified, highly sensitive immunofluorometric assay in samples obtained from three published studies using T enanthate (TE; 100 and 200 mg weekly) plus daily oral doses of cyproterone acetate (CPA; 5-100 mg), levonogestrel (LNG; 150-500 micro g), or desogestrel (DSG; 150-300 micro g). Overall, men with sperm concentrations below 0.1 million/ml had significantly lower gonadotropin levels (serum FSH, approximately 0.12 IU/liter; serum LH, approximately 0.05 IU/liter) than oligospermic men (sperm concentrations, 0.1-5 million/ml; serum FSH, 0.23-0.5 IU/liter; serum LH, 0.05-0.56 IU/liter), but the relationship was weak, indicating the possible existence of other determinants. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the influence of candidate predictors of spermatogenic effects of the T plus progestin regimens. In the LNG and DSG studies, the marked suppression of serum LH to less than 5% of baseline values (<0.15 IU/liter) was a consistent and highly significant predictor of sperm concentration (reduced to 2-7% that seen at higher LH levels) and the likelihood of its suppression below 1 million/ml (a proposed threshold for contraceptive efficacy). Serum FSH was not a significant independent predictor. The use of DSG and CPA (but not LNG) was a significant independent predictor of sperm suppression, and regimens that contained 200 mg TE weekly caused less spermatogenic suppression than 100 mg TE weekly. These findings suggest that T-progestin contraceptive regimens suppress sperm concentration by gonadotropin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The suppression of serum LH is a major predictor of the suppression of sperm concentration suppression in the LNG and DSG treatment studies. On the other hand, the greater spermatogenic suppression in regimens containing DSG or CPA suggests that these progestins have additional actions to suppress spermatogenesis via a gonadotropin-independent mechanism(s)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14715841     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-030616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  10 in total

Review 1.  As the world grows: contraception in the 21st century.

Authors:  R John Aitken; Mark A Baker; Gustavo F Doncel; Martin M Matzuk; Christine K Mauck; Michael J K Harper
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Characteristics associated with suppression of spermatogenesis in a male hormonal contraceptive trial using testosterone and Nestorone(®) gels.

Authors:  M Y Roth; N Ilani; C Wang; S T Page; W J Bremner; R S Swerdloff; C Dart; R Sitruk-Ware; N Kumar; D Blithe; J K Amory
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.842

Review 3.  Progesterone in gender-affirming therapy of trans women.

Authors:  Charalampos Milionis; Ioannis Ilias; Eftychia Koukkou
Journal:  World J Biol Chem       Date:  2022-05-27

Review 4.  Progress and prospects in male hormonal contraception.

Authors:  John K Amory
Journal:  Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 5.  Advances in male contraception.

Authors:  Stephanie T Page; John K Amory; William J Bremner
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 19.871

6.  Effects of 28 Days of Oral Dimethandrolone Undecanoate in Healthy Men: A Prototype Male Pill.

Authors:  Arthi Thirumalai; Jonas Ceponis; John K Amory; Ronald Swerdloff; Vijaya Surampudi; Peter Y Liu; William J Bremner; Eric Harvey; Diana L Blithe; Min S Lee; Laura Hull; Christina Wang; Stephanie T Page
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Determinants of the rate and extent of spermatogenic suppression during hormonal male contraception: an integrated analysis.

Authors:  Peter Y Liu; Ronald S Swerdloff; Bradley D Anawalt; Richard A Anderson; William J Bremner; Joerg Elliesen; Yi-Qun Gu; Wendy M Kersemaekers; Robert I McLachlan; M Cristina Meriggiola; Eberhard Nieschlag; Regine Sitruk-Ware; Kirsten Vogelsong; Xing-Hai Wang; Frederick C W Wu; Michael Zitzmann; David J Handelsman; Christina Wang
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Male hormonal contraception: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  M Y Roth; S T Page; W J Bremner
Journal:  Andrology       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.842

9.  Hormonal, chemical and thermal inhibition of spermatogenesis: contribution of French teams to international data with the aim of developing male contraception in France.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Soufir
Journal:  Basic Clin Androl       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 10.  Progesterone: A Steroid with Wide Range of Effects in Physiology as Well as Human Medicine.

Authors:  Lucie Kolatorova; Jana Vitku; Josef Suchopar; Martin Hill; Antonin Parizek
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.208

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.