Literature DB >> 14715735

Sensitivity of respiratory virus culture when screening with R-mix fresh cells.

James J Dunn1, R Dean Woolstenhulme, Janine Langer, Karen C Carroll.   

Abstract

Use of R-Mix Fresh Cells has been shown to be a rapid and sensitive method for the detection and identification of respiratory viruses. We prospectively evaluated the impact of incorporation of R-Mix shell vials on the sensitivity and time to detection of seven respiratory viruses recovered in a comprehensive culture during the course of an entire respiratory season in a high-volume clinical laboratory. In this study, R-Mix shell vials were used as part of the culture of 3803 respiratory specimens. A total of 428 respiratory viruses were recovered. Staining of R-Mix vials after overnight incubation allowed initial detection of 274 of 279 influenza viruses, 33 of 38 parainfluenza viruses, 35 of 51 adenoviruses, and 52 of 60 respiratory syncytial viruses (RSVs). The time to reporting of all positive cultures after in-lab specimen receipt was 2.9 days on average and those initially detected in R-Mix cells were reported in 2.3 days on average. A combination of direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining and virus culture was performed on a subset of 711 respiratory specimens. Of 152 viruses identified, 57 were observed only with DFA testing (55 RSV and 2 influenza A viruses) and 31 were recovered only in cell culture. After overnight incubation, R-Mix cells detected 87.1% of respiratory viruses not observed by DFA testing and 96.9% of viruses positive by both methods. The sensitivities of DFA testing and R-Mix cells for identification of influenza viruses were 70.5% and 96.7%, respectively. The R-Mix method detected influenza virus in 18 samples that were negative by DFA testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14715735      PMCID: PMC321661          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.79-82.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  R-Mix cells are faster, at least as sensitive and marginally more costly than conventional cell lines for the detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; T Mueller; T Troutt; J O'Brien; K Guttman
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  SimulFluor respiratory screen for rapid detection of multiple respiratory viruses in clinical specimens by immunofluorescence staining.

Authors:  M L Landry; D Ferguson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of the Denka-Seiken INFLU A.B-Quick and BD Directigen Flu A+B kits with direct fluorescent-antibody staining and shell vial culture methods for rapid detection of influenza viruses.

Authors:  James J Dunn; Chris Gordon; Christy Kelley; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Mink lung cells and mixed mink lung and A549 cells for rapid detection of influenza virus and other respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Y T Huang; B M Turchek
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid and sensitive detection of respiratory virus infections for directed antiviral treatment using R-Mix cultures.

Authors:  Kirsten St George; Navin M Patel; Robert A Hartwig; David R Scholl; Joseph A Jollick; Lynn M Kauffmann; Martin R Evans; Charles R Rinaldo
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.168

6.  Performance characteristics of VIDAS and directigen respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigen detection assays and culture for the identification of RSV in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  Julie A Ribes; John Pat Seabolt; Sue B Overman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Cost-effectiveness of rapid diagnosis of viral respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients.

Authors:  P C Woo; S S Chiu; W H Seto; M Peiris
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Clinical and financial benefits of rapid detection of respiratory viruses: an outcomes study.

Authors:  J Barenfanger; C Drake; N Leon; T Mueller; T Troutt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of BioStar FLU OIA assay for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  M Hindiyeh; C Goulding; H Morgan; B Kenyon; J Langer; L Fox; G Dean; D Woolstenhulme; A Turnbow; E Billetdeaux; S Shakib; C Gordon; A Powers; G Vardeny; M Johnson; L Skodack-Jones; K Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  Comparison of a new neuraminidase detection assay with an enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in nasal wash specimens.

Authors:  D E Noyola; B Clark; F T O'Donnell; R L Atmar; J Greer; G J Demmler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  26 in total

1.  Comparison of the Binax NOW Flu A enzyme immunochromatographic assay and R-Mix shell vial culture for the 2003-2004 influenza season.

Authors:  Robert C Fader
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evaluation of the Quidel QuickVue test for detection of influenza A and B viruses in the pediatric emergency medicine setting by use of three specimen collection methods.

Authors:  Konstantinos Agoritsas; Kathy Mack; Bema K Bonsu; Debbie Goodman; Douglas Salamon; Mario J Marcon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Virological and Immunological Outcomes of Coinfections.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar; Shalini Sharma; Sanjay Barua; Bhupendra N Tripathi; Barry T Rouse
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Relevance of influenza a virus detection by PCR, shell vial assay, and tube cell culture to rapid reporting procedures.

Authors:  Nicole L Zitterkopf; Surbhi Leekha; Mark J Espy; Christina M Wood; Priya Sampathkumar; Thomas F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  [Contribution of microbiological investigations to the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections].

Authors:  O Leroy
Journal:  Med Mal Infect       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.152

Review 8.  Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods.

Authors:  James B Mahony
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  MultiCode-PLx system for multiplexed detection of seventeen respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Frederick S Nolte; David J Marshall; Christopher Rasberry; Sabina Schievelbein; Grier G Banks; Gregory A Storch; Max Q Arens; Richard S Buller; James R Prudent
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of viral isolation and multiplex real-time reverse transcription-PCR for confirmation of respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus detection by antigen immunoassays.

Authors:  R S Liao; L L Tomalty; A Majury; D E Zoutman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.