Literature DB >> 14712878

Robotic versus telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: duration of surgery and outcomes.

Katherine Hourmont1, Woosup Chung, Stephen Pereira, Annette Wasielewski, Richard Davies, Garth H Ballantyne.   

Abstract

This study found that robotic and telerobotic operations were accomplished with the same mortality, morbidity, blood loss, length of operations and length of stay. The DaVinci operations required longer total operating room time than the AESOP operations. Telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy achieved the same clinical outcomes as standard robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this small trial. This study justifies further comparison of these techniques in a randomized prospective trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14712878     DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00167-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  4 in total

1.  A consensus document on robotic surgery.

Authors:  D M Herron; M Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Kumarakrishnan Samraj; Giuseppe Fusai; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

3.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Telerobotic gastrointestinal surgery: phase 2--safety and efficacy.

Authors:  G H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.