Literature DB >> 14711848

Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff.

M Cuttini1, V Casotto, M Kaminski, I de Beaufort, I Berbik, G Hansen, L Kollée, A Kucinskas, S Lenoir, A Levin, M Orzalesi, J Persson, M Rebagliato, M Reid, R Saracci.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the views of a representative sample of neonatal doctors and nurses in 10 European countries on the moral acceptability of active euthanasia and its legal regulation.
DESIGN: A total of 142 neonatal intensive care units were recruited by census (in the Netherlands, Sweden, Hungary, and the Baltic countries) or random sampling (in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom); 1391 doctors and 3410 nurses completed an anonymous questionnaire (response rates 89% and 86% respectively). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The staff opinion that the law in their country should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now".
RESULTS: Active euthanasia appeared to be both acceptable and practiced in the Netherlands, France, and to a lesser extent Lithuania, and less acceptable in Sweden, Hungary, Italy, and Spain. More then half (53%) of the doctors in the Netherlands, but only a quarter (24%) in France felt that the law should be changed to allow active euthanasia "more than now". For 40% of French doctors, end of life issues should not be regulated by law. Being male, regular involvement in research, less than six years professional experience, and having ever participated in a decision of active euthanasia were positively associated with an opinion favouring relaxation of legal constraints. Having had children, religiousness, and believing in the absolute value of human life showed a negative association. Nurses were slightly more likely to consider active euthanasia acceptable in selected circumstances, and to feel that the law should be changed to allow it more than now.
CONCLUSIONS: Opinions of health professionals vary widely between countries, and, even where neonatal euthanasia is already practiced, do not uniformly support its legalisation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711848      PMCID: PMC1721640          DOI: 10.1136/fn.89.1.f19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  18 in total

1.  Parental visiting, communication, and participation in ethical decisions: a comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe.

Authors:  M Cuttini; M Rebagliato; P Bortoli; G Hansen; R de Leeuw; S Lenoir; J Persson; M Reid; M Schroell; U de Vonderweid; M Kaminski; H Lenard; M Orzalesi; R Saracci
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Netherlands legalise euthanasia.

Authors:  W Weber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  UK woman's right-to-die case fails.

Authors:  H Ashraf
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Why active euthanasia and physician assisted suicide should be legalised.

Authors:  L Doyal; L Doyal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

5.  Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. Are we treading a fine line?

Authors:  K Street; J Henderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

6.  Ethical debate: The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. The doctrine of double effect is difficult but not impossible to apply.

Authors:  S J Edwards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-18

7.  Euthanasia: where the Netherlands leads will the world follow? No. Legalisation is a diversion from improving care for the dying.

Authors:  E J Emanuel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-09

8.  Illustration of analysis taking into account complex survey considerations: the association between wine consumption and dementia in the PAQUID study. Personnes Ages Quid.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; L Letenneur; J F Dartigues; S Lafont; J M Orgogozo; D Commenges
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Neonatal euthanasia: moral considerations and criminal liability.

Authors:  M Sklansky
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Euthanasia in The Netherlands.

Authors:  G van der Wal; R J Dillmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-21
View more
  11 in total

1.  The use of drugs with a life-shortening effect in end-of-life care in neonates and infants.

Authors:  Veerle Provoost; Filip Cools; Johan Bilsen; José Ramet; Peter Deconinck; Robert Vander Stichele; Anne Vande Velde; Inge Van Herreweghe; Freddy Mortier; Yvan Vandenplas; Luc Deliens
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Ethics support in clinical practice.

Authors:  A R Watson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  The operationalisation of religion and world view in surveys of nurses' attitudes toward euthanasia and assisted suicide.

Authors:  Joris Gielen; Stef Van den Branden; Bert Broeckaert
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-07-21

4.  The acceptability of ending a patient's life.

Authors:  M Guedj; M Gibert; A Maudet; M T Muñoz Sastre; E Mullet; P C Sorum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Involuntary euthanasia of severely ill newborns: is the Groningen Protocol really dangerous?

Authors:  P Voultsos; F Chatzinikolaou
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Attitudes among the general Austrian population towards neonatal euthanasia: a survey.

Authors:  Lena Goldnagl; Wolfgang Freidl; Willibald J Stronegger
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Awareness and Attitude of Select Professionals toward Euthanasia in Delhi, India.

Authors:  Sheetal Singh; Shakti Gupta; I B Singh; Nirupam Madaan
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 8.  Neonatal end-of-life decisions and ethical perspectives.

Authors:  Madjid Soltani Gerdfaramarzi; Shabnam Bazmi
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2020-12-05

9.  Neonatal euthanasia: A claim for an immoral law.

Authors:  Serge Vanden Eijnden; Dana Martinovici
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2013-06

10.  Is Every Life Worth Saving: Does Religion and Religious Beliefs Influence Paramedic's End-of-Life Decision-making? A Prospective Questionnaire-based Investigation.

Authors:  Alexander Leibold; Christoph L Lassen; Nicole Lindenberg; Bernhard M Graf; Christoph Hr Wiese
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.