Literature DB >> 14711542

Impact of repeated antral follicle counts on the prediction of poor ovarian response in women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

László F J M M Bancsi1, Frank J M Broekmans, Caspar W N Looman, J Dik F Habbema, Egbert R te Velde.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the value of a single antral follicle count and the additional value of repeated counts in different cycles for the prediction of poor ovarian response in IVF.
DESIGN: Prospective.
SETTING: Tertiary fertility center. PATIENT(S): One hundred twenty women undergoing their first IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Measurement of the number of antral follicles on cycle day 3 in two spontaneous cycles. Ovarian response. RESULT(S): A single antral follicle count is clearly predictive of poor ovarian response and there is good agreement between repeated measurements in subsequent cycles (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROC(AUC)]; cycle 1: 0.87, cycle 2: 0.85). In a logistic regression analysis, information obtained after the second cycle contributed significantly to the prediction of poor response by the antral follicle count of the first cycle. The predictive accuracy of the highest of two counts (ROC(AUC) 0.89) was slightly better than that of each single count. The predictive model with the highest count yielded slightly higher values of specificity and positive predictive value. Sensitivity, negative predictive value, and error rates were slightly lower. CONCLUSION(S): A single antral follicle count is a good predictor of poor ovarian response in IVF. Although the impact of a second antral follicle count on ovarian response predictions in IVF is statistically significant, clinical relevance is very limited. Repeating an antral follicle count in a subsequent cycle is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711542     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  Antral follice counts (AFC) predict ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation cycles.

Authors:  Alaina Vrontikis; Peter L Chang; Peter Kovacs; Steven R Lindheim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Single and repeated GnRH agonist stimulation tests compared with basal markers of ovarian reserve in the prediction of outcome in IVF.

Authors:  D J Hendriks; F J Broekmans; L F J M M Bancsi; C W N Looman; F H de Jong; E R te Velde
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Prediction of high ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: anti-Müllerian hormone versus small antral follicle count (2-6 mm).

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Mehmet Firat Mutlu; Mehmet Erdem; Ahmet Erdem; Sule Yildiz; Ilknur Mutlu; Ozgur Arisoy; Mesut Oktem
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Giovanna Sighinolfi; Alessandra Tirelli; Cindy Argento; Claudia Re; Daniela Tagliasacchi; Tiziana Marsella; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The use of serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels and antral follicle count (AFC) to predict the number of oocytes collected and availability of embryos for cryopreservation in IVF.

Authors:  L Kotanidis; K Nikolettos; S Petousis; B Asimakopoulos; E Chatzimitrou; G Kolios; N Nikolettos
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Ovarian reserve tests.

Authors:  Padma Rekah Jirge
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-09

Review 8.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

9.  Bone morphogenetic protein-15 in follicle fluid combined with age may differentiate between successful and unsuccessful poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  Yan-Ting Wu; Ting-Ting Wang; Xi-Jing Chen; Xiao-Ming Zhu; Min-Yue Dong; Jian-Zhong Sheng; Chen-Ming Xu; He-Feng Huang
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Anogenital distance is related to ovarian follicular number in young Spanish women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jaime Mendiola; Manuela Roca; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Maria-Pilar Mira-Escolano; José J López-Espín; Emily S Barrett; Shanna H Swan; Alberto M Torres-Cantero
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.