AIMS: To evaluate children referred for defecation disorders using the child behavioural checklist (CBCL). METHODS: A total of 215 patients were divided into three groups: 135 (5-14 years of age) with paediatric constipation (PC), 56 (5-17 years) with functional non-retentive faecal soiling (FNRFS), and 24 (5-16 years) with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP). Behavioural scores were correlated with colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal function parameters (manometry and EMG). RESULTS: No significant differences in the mean CBCL scores were found among the three patient groups. However, children with PC and FNRFS had significantly more behavioural problems than the Dutch normative sample, while children with RAP had scores within the normal range. No significant differences were found between CTT in the patient groups, with respect to the CBCL. Similarly, no significant difference existed between children able or unable to relax their pelvic floor muscles during defecation attempts and their behaviour profiles. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no relation between colonic/anorectal function and specific behavioural profiles. On the other hand, children with defecation disorders show more behavioural problems than do controls.
AIMS: To evaluate children referred for defecation disorders using the child behavioural checklist (CBCL). METHODS: A total of 215 patients were divided into three groups: 135 (5-14 years of age) with paediatric constipation (PC), 56 (5-17 years) with functional non-retentive faecal soiling (FNRFS), and 24 (5-16 years) with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP). Behavioural scores were correlated with colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal function parameters (manometry and EMG). RESULTS: No significant differences in the mean CBCL scores were found among the three patient groups. However, children with PC and FNRFS had significantly more behavioural problems than the Dutch normative sample, while children with RAP had scores within the normal range. No significant differences were found between CTT in the patient groups, with respect to the CBCL. Similarly, no significant difference existed between children able or unable to relax their pelvic floor muscles during defecation attempts and their behaviour profiles. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no relation between colonic/anorectal function and specific behavioural profiles. On the other hand, children with defecation disorders show more behavioural problems than do controls.
Authors: P Arhan; G Devroede; B Jehannin; M Lanza; C Faverdin; C Dornic; B Persoz; L Tétreault; B Perey; D Pellerin Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 1981 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Eleni Athanasakos; Sally Dalton; Susan McDowell; Tara Shea; Kate Blakeley; David Rawat; Stewart Cleeve Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: F de Lorijn; M P van Wijk; J B Reitsma; R van Ginkel; J A J M Taminiau; M A Benninga Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Marloes E J Bongers; Marc A Benninga; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Martha A Grootenhuis Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2009-03-02 Impact factor: 3.186