Literature DB >> 14706593

Robotic assisted rectopexy.

Yaron Munz1, Krishna Moorthy, Rishma Kudchadkar, Juan David Hernandez, Shirley Martin, Ara Darzi, Timothy Rockall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the last 3 years, robotic surgery has had a considerable impact on minimally invasive surgery in a wide range of specialties. This study describes the surgical technique and preliminary results of our first 6 cases of robotic assisted suture rectopexy.
METHODS: During a period of 13 months 6 patients with full thickness rectal prolapse were operated on with the da Vinci surgical system. All patients were considered suitable for a suture rectopexy. Setting-up time, procedure time, patient recovery, and hospital stay were recorded and compared with the current literature.
RESULTS: All operations were completed successfully using the robotic system. There were no major complications and no deaths. Mean setting-up time was 28 minutes, mean operation time was 127 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 6 days. At 3 to 6 months of follow-up all patients are in good health, with no signs of recurrence and no reports of constipation.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted suture rectopexy is feasible and safe and apparently meets accepted standards of laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706593     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2002.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  17 in total

1.  Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  A Ayav; L Bresler; J Hubert; L Brunaud; P Boissel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Standardized surgical technique and dedicated operating room environment can reduce the operative time during robotic-assisted surgery for pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Surendra Mantoo; Jerome Rigaud; Sophie Naulet; Paul-Antoine Lehur; Guillaume Meurette
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2013-06-07

Review 3.  Is robotic ventral mesh rectopexy better than laparoscopy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Ramage; P Georgiou; P Tekkis; E Tan
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.

Authors:  Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh; Mark H Hanna; Joseph C Carmichael; Alessio Pigazzi; Michael J Stamos; Steven Mills
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Chang Hee Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Future of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Matthew Whealon; Alessio Vinci; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 7.  Rectal prolapse: an overview of clinical features, diagnosis, and patient-specific management strategies.

Authors:  Liliana Bordeianou; Caitlin W Hicks; Andreas M Kaiser; Karim Alavi; Ranjan Sudan; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Long-term outcomes of robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Agathe Postillon; Cyril Perrenot; Adeline Germain; Marie-Lorraine Scherrer; Cyrille Buisset; Laurent Brunaud; Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse: a matched-pairs study of operative details and complications.

Authors:  J Mäkelä-Kaikkonen; T Rautio; K Klintrup; H Takala; M Vierimaa; P Ohtonen; J Mäkelä
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  Short-term outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Is robotic superior?

Authors:  Rao K Mehmood; Jody Parker; L Bhuvimanian; Eyas Qasem; Ahmed A Mohammed; Muhammad Zeeshan; Kirsten Grugel; Paul Carter; Shakil Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.