Literature DB >> 14706466

Absence of gaze direction effects on EEG measures of sensorimotor function.

C W Hesse1, E Seiss, R M Bracewell, P Praamstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gaze direction is known to modulate the activation patterns of sensorimotor areas as seen at the single cell level and in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To determine whether such gaze direction effects can be observed in scalp-recorded electroencephalogram (EEG) measures of sensorimotor function we investigated somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and steady state movement related cortical potentials (MRPs).
METHODS: In two separate experiments, SEPs were elicited by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (experiment 1) and steady state MRPs were induced by 2 Hz tapping paced by an auditory cue (experiment 2), while subjects directed their gaze 15 degrees to the left or to the right.
RESULTS: Gaze direction failed to produce any appreciable differences in the waveforms of the SEPs or MRPs. In particular, there was no effect on peak amplitude, peak latency and peak scalp topography measures of SEP and MRP components, or on spatial or temporal parameters of dipole models of the underlying cortical generators. Additional frequency domain analyses did not reveal reliable gaze-related changes in induced power at electrode sites overlying somatosensory and motor areas, or in coherence between pairs of parietal, central and frontal electrodes, across a broad range of frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: EEG measures of sensorimotor function, obtained in a non-visual motor task, are insensitive to modulatory effects of gaze direction in sensorimotor areas that are observable with fMRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706466     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00302-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Misconceptions about mirror-induced motor cortex activation.

Authors:  Peter Praamstra; Laura Torney; Christian J Rawle; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  How Electroencephalogram Reference Influences the Movement Readiness Potential?

Authors:  Yuxia Hu; Lipeng Zhang; Mingming Chen; Xiaoyuan Li; Li Shi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Non-linear Analysis of Scalp EEG by Using Bispectra: The Effect of the Reference Choice.

Authors:  Federico Chella; Antea D'Andrea; Alessio Basti; Vittorio Pizzella; Laura Marzetti
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  The Effects of Different Reference Methods on Decision-Making Implications of Auditory Brainstem Response.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Liu; Xin Wang; Mingxing Zhu; Yuchao He; Lin Li; Li Chen; Weimin Huang; Zhilong Wei; Shixiong Chen; Yan Chen; Guanglin Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  How Different EEG References Influence Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Graphs.

Authors:  Yunzhi Huang; Junpeng Zhang; Yuan Cui; Gang Yang; Ling He; Qi Liu; Guangfu Yin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Sensor Level Functional Connectivity Topography Comparison Between Different References Based EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Yunzhi Huang; Junpeng Zhang; Yuan Cui; Gang Yang; Qi Liu; Guangfu Yin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.