Literature DB >> 14705284

The word 'cancer': reframing the context to reduce anxiety arousal.

Robert J Donovan1, Geoffrey Jalleh, Sandra C Jones.   

Abstract

This study investigated reaction to the word 'cancer' versus the phrase 'a cancer' in two ways: (1) assessing associations to the spoken words 'cancer' or 'a cancer'; and (2) presenting participants with a situation where one person says to another in print. 'I have cancer' or 'I have a cancer'. The participants were a convenience sample of 112 adults (i.e. aged 18 years or over), 55 males and 57 females, recruited via a mall intercept survey in the Perth (Western Australia) central business district. Participants were randomly assigned to either the 'cancer' condition or the 'a cancer' condition. Both methods confirmed that cancer arouses primarily negative affective responses in the vast majority of people. It was hypothesised that using 'a cancer' might lead to less negative affect associations than just the word 'cancer'. This was found to be the case for the spoken word association technique, but not for the printed cartoon technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14705284     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2003.tb00397.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  7 in total

1.  Women's interest in taking tamoxifen and raloxifene for breast cancer prevention: response to a tailored decision aid.

Authors:  Angela Fagerlin; Amanda J Dillard; Dylan M Smith; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Rosemarie Pitsch; Jennifer B McClure; Sarah Greene; Sharon Hensley Alford; Vijayan Nair; Daniel F Hayes; Cheryl Wiese; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Does Hearing About Cancer Influence Stimulus Control? An Exploratory Study of Verbal Modulation of Stimulus Generalization.

Authors:  Thomas S Critchfield; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2016-05-02

Review 3.  Motivation for Launching a Cancer Metastasis Inhibition (CMI) Program.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Rebecca N Jerome; Martin L Ogletree; Gordon R Bernard; Robert R Lavieri; Nicole M Zaleski; Charles C Hong; Jana K Shirey-Rice; Carlos L Arteaga; Ingrid A Mayer; Kenneth J Holroyd; Rebecca S Cook
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.493

4.  Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amanda J Dillard; Angela Fagerlin; Sonya Dal Cin; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Informed choice about breast cancer prevention: randomized controlled trial of an online decision aid intervention.

Authors:  Ida J Korfage; Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis; Peter A Ubel; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Sarah M Greene; Jennifer B McClure; Dylan M Smith; Sharon Hensley Alford; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Public Perceptions on Cancer Incidence and Survival: A Nation-wide Survey in Korea.

Authors:  Soyeun Kim; Dong Wook Shin; Hyung Kook Yang; So Young Kim; Young-Jin Ko; BeLong Cho; Young Sung Lee; Dukhyoung Lee; Keeho Park; Jong Hyock Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.679

7.  Uptake of tamoxifen in consecutive premenopausal women under surveillance in a high-risk breast cancer clinic.

Authors:  L S Donnelly; D G Evans; J Wiseman; J Fox; R Greenhalgh; J Affen; I Juraskova; P Stavrinos; S Dawe; J Cuzick; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.