Literature DB >> 14698291

Most chloroplast DNA of maize seedlings in linear molecules with defined ends and branched forms.

Delene J Oldenburg1, Arnold J Bendich.   

Abstract

We used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, restriction fragment mapping, and fluorescence microscopy of individual DNA molecules to analyze the structure of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) from shoots of ten to 14 day old maize seedlings. We find that most of the cpDNA is in linear and complex branched forms, with only 3-4% as circles. We find the ends of linear genomic monomers and head-to-tail (h-t) concatemers within inverted repeat sequences (IRs) near probable origins of replication, not at random sites as expected from broken circles. Our results predict two major and three minor populations of linear molecules, each with different ends and putative origins of replication. Our mapping data predict equimolar populations of h-t linear concatemeric molecules differing only in the relative orientation (inversion) of the single copy regions. We show how recombination during replication can produce h-t linear concatemers containing an inversion of single copy sequences that has for 20 years been attributed to recombinational flipping between IRs in a circular chromosome. We propose that replication is initiated predominantly on linear, not circular, DNA, producing multi-genomic branched chromosomes and that most replication involves strand invasion of internal regions by the ends of linear molecules, rather than the generally accepted D-loop-to-theta mechanism. We speculate that if the minor amount of cpDNA in circular form is useful to the plant, its contribution to chloroplast function does not depend on the circularity of these cpDNA molecules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14698291     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.11.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  56 in total

Review 1.  Circular chloroplast chromosomes: the grand illusion.

Authors:  Arnold J Bendich
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  The evolutionary processes of mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes differ from those of nuclear genomes.

Authors:  Helena Korpelainen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-09-28

3.  Loss or retention of chloroplast DNA in maize seedlings is affected by both light and genotype.

Authors:  Delene J Oldenburg; Beth A Rowan; Lei Zhao; Cristina L Walcher; Marc Schleh; Arnold J Bendich
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Linear molecules of tobacco ptDNA end at known replication origins and additional loci.

Authors:  Lars B Scharff; Hans-Ulrich Koop
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 4.076

5.  A baculovirus alkaline nuclease knockout construct produces fragmented DNA and aberrant capsids.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Okano; Adam L Vanarsdall; George F Rohrmann
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 3.616

6.  Plastid Genomes of Flowering Plants: Essential Principles.

Authors:  Tracey A Ruhlman; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  PPR proteins of green algae.

Authors:  Nicolas J Tourasse; Yves Choquet; Olivier Vallon
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Replication intermediates of the linear mitochondrial DNA of Candida parapsilosis suggest a common recombination based mechanism for yeast mitochondria.

Authors:  Joachim M Gerhold; Tiina Sedman; Katarina Visacka; Judita Slezakova; Lubomir Tomaska; Jozef Nosek; Juhan Sedman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The demise of chloroplast DNA in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Beth A Rowan; Delene J Oldenburg; Arnold J Bendich
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  The linear plastid chromosomes of maize: terminal sequences, structures, and implications for DNA replication.

Authors:  Delene J Oldenburg; Arnold J Bendich
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.