Literature DB >> 14697492

Discharge of inferior olive cells during reaching errors and perturbations.

Kris M Horn1, Milton Pong, Alan R Gibson.   

Abstract

It is widely believed that inferior olive (IO) neurons signal the occurrence of movement errors. The IO compares descending motor commands with information about movement and detects mismatches. Presumably, this error signal is used by the cerebellum to improve motor performance. To test this theory, we trained cats to reach out, grasp and retrieve a handle on cue. After training, the handle was displaced on selected trials so the cats would reach but miss the handle. Fifty-five IO cells with receptive fields on the forelimb were tested with the displaced handle condition. No cell fired at or near the time of "expected" contact, but some cells fired when the cats struck objects while attempting to grasp. A mismatch between a motor command and expected result is not sufficient to activate IO neurons; appropriate stimulation must occur. To define conditions for appropriate stimulation, the limb was stimulated at various times during the task. Sixty-six cells (including the 55 tested under the displaced handle condition) were tested with mechanical stimulation during quiet stance, and 98% responded to stimulation. A smaller percentage (68%) fired when stimulation was introduced during the reaching task, and the probability of these responses varied with the subdivision of the olive as well as the phase of the task. We conclude that it is unlikely that IO discharge provides information about movement or movement error. Olivary cells respond reliably to appropriate somatosensory stimulation but not to active movement or movement error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14697492     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  14 in total

Review 1.  Activation of climbing fibers.

Authors:  Alan R Gibson; Kris M Horn; Milton Pong
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  On the cerebello-cerebral interactions.

Authors:  Mario-Ubaldo Manto
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Inferior olive oscillation as the temporal basis for motricity and oscillatory reset as the basis for motor error correction.

Authors:  R R Llinás
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Cerebellar motor learning versus cerebellar motor timing: the climbing fibre story.

Authors:  Rodolfo R Llinás
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Peter A Butcher; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Cerebellar physiology: links between microcircuitry properties and sensorimotor functions.

Authors:  Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Population coding in the cerebellum: a machine learning perspective.

Authors:  Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Encoding of sensory prediction errors in the human cerebellum.

Authors:  John Schlerf; Richard B Ivry; Jörn Diedrichsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Climbing fiber coupling between adjacent purkinje cell dendrites in vivo.

Authors:  Fredrik Bengtsson; Henrik Jörntell
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 5.505

10.  Stimulation within the cuneate nucleus suppresses synaptic activation of climbing fibers.

Authors:  Pontus Geborek; Henrik Jörntell; Fredrik Bengtsson
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.