Literature DB >> 14697370

The current status of digital mammography.

J J James1.   

Abstract

Digital imaging has shown rapid advances in recent years. Various different digital mammography systems are now available for clinical use. Digital mammography does have clear advantages over traditional screen film mammography, but this is yet to convincingly translate into improved cancer detection rates. This review aims to describe the different technologies, introduce concepts related to image quality and review the current evidence for the use of digital mammography systems in clinical practice. Advanced applications of digital mammography such as computer-aided detection (CAD) are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 14697370     DOI： 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN： 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  7 in total

1.  Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging.

Authors:  Qianqian Fang; Juliette Selb; Stefan A Carp; Gregory Boverman; Eric L Miller; Dana H Brooks; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; David A Boas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: comparison in the patients with microcalcifications.

Authors:  Hye Seong Kim; Boo Kyung Han; Ki Seok Choo; Yong Hwan Jeon; Jung Han Kim; Yeon Hyeon Choe
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a computed radiography system by comparison of digital hard copy images with screen-film mammography: results of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  C Van Ongeval; H Bosmans; A Van Steen; K Joossens; V Celis; M Van Goethem; I Verslegers; K Nijs; F Rogge; G Marchal
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The effect of Premium View post-processing software on digital mammographic reporting.

Authors:  E J Goldstraw; I Castellano; S Ashley; S Allen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Increasing display luminance as a means to enhance interpretation accuracy and efficiency when reducing full-field digital mammography dose.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-07-27

Review 6.  State of the art of current modalities for the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Authors:  Cosimo Di Maggio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an indirect small-field CCD technique using a high-contrast phantom.

Authors:  Kathrin Barbara Krug; Hartmut Stützer; Peter Frommolt; Julia Boecker; Henning Bovenschulte; Volker Sendler; Klaus Lackner
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-10-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.