Literature DB >> 14696666

Clinical evaluation of short, machined-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months.

Georges Tawil1, Roland Younan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Bone resorption following tooth loss often limits the quantity of bone available for implant placement. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of 10-mm or shorter machined-surface implants when used exclusively in the treatment of various forms of edentulism.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-nine screw-type Brånemark System implants (Nobel Biocare), 10 mm or shorter, were placed in 111 consecutively treated patients. Of the total, 88.8% were placed in the mandible and 11.2% were placed in the maxilla; 95.2% were used to treat partially edentulous situations, including single-tooth losses, of which 96.6% were in the premolar and molar regions. The patients were followed for periods of 12 to 92 months.
RESULTS: Of the 269 placed implants, 12 were lost. The overall survival rate was 95.5%. Bone quality 2 and 3 (Lekholm-Zarb classification of 1985) was found in 88.8% of the treated sites. There was no statistical difference in the survival rate of the 10-mm implants when compared to the shorter series (P > .05) or between the various implant diameters. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.71 +/- 0.65 mm. DISCUSSION: The failure rate of 4.5% compares favorably with that of implants of different shape, surface characteristics, and length. Bone quality appeared to be the critical factor in implant survival, rather than bone quantity, in this patient series.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the survival of short, machined-surface implants when used for the treatment of partial edentulism in bone of good quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14696666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Posterior partially edentulous jaws, planning a rehabilitation with dental implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Monteiro; Emily V F Silva; Eduardo P Pellizzer; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 2.  Short Implants: New Horizon in Implant Dentistry.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Manisha Gulati; Meenu Garg; Chetan Pathak
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Short implants: A systematic review.

Authors:  I Karthikeyan; Shrikar R Desai; Rika Singh
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-07

4.  Survival of immediately versus delayed loaded short implants: A prospective case series study.

Authors:  Joaquin Alvira-González; Erick Díaz-Campos; Maria-Angeles Sánchez-Garcés; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

5.  A two-short-implant-supported molar restoration in atrophic posterior maxilla: A finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Yong Song; Yoon-Hyuk Huh; Chan-Jin Park; Lee-Ra Cho
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 6.  A meta-analysis on the effect of implant characteristics on the survival of the wide-diameter implant.

Authors:  Miriam Ting; Matthew Palermo; David P Donatelli; John P Gaughan; Jon B Suzuki; Steven R Jefferies
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-11-03

7.  Simplifying the Treatment of Bone Atrophy in the Posterior Regions: Combination of Zygomatic and Wide-Short Implants-A Case Report with 2 Years of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fernanda Faot; Geninho Thomé; Amália Machado Bielemann; Caio Hermann; Ana Cláudia Moreira Melo; Luis Eduardo Marques Padovan; Ivete Aparecida de Mattias Sartori
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2016-10-27

8.  Cumulative Success Rate of Short and Ultrashort Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla: A 3-Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giorgio Lombardo; Jacopo Pighi; Mauro Marincola; Giovanni Corrocher; Miguel Simancas-Pallares; Pier Francesco Nocini
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-07-02

9.  The Influence of the Crown-Implant Ratio on the Crestal Bone Level and Implant Secondary Stability: 36-Month Clinical Study.

Authors:  Jakub Hadzik; Maciej Krawiec; Konstanty Sławecki; Christiane Kunert-Keil; Marzena Dominiak; Tomasz Gedrange
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Influence of short implants geometry on primary stability.

Authors:  J González-Serrano; P Molinero-Mourelle; B Pardal-Peláez; L-M Sáez-Alcaide; R Ortega; J López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.