Literature DB >> 14695644

Spectrum bias: a quantitative and graphical analysis of the variability of medical diagnostic test performance.

Catherine Goehring1, Arnaud Perrier, Alfredo Morabia.   

Abstract

The performance of a medical diagnostic test may vary in a subgroup of patients according to the severity and clinical presentation of the disease. This phenomenon is often referred to as the spectrum effect. There is currently no technique to determine in which situations this spectrum effect may lead to a spectrum bias, that is, a distortion of the posterior probability which can potentially affect the clinical decision. We show that spectrum bias, on either a positive or a negative test result, can be expressed as the subgroup-specific likelihood ratio (LR) divided by the LR in the overall population of patients. This assessment of spectrum bias is independent of the pretest probability. We present here the test statistic and its variance and also propose a mode of graphically visualizing the presence of spectrum bias. We applied it to 15 examples from the literature, of which three are discussed in detail. In two examples, there was spectrum bias: (1) diagnosis of urinary tract infection in subgroups of low or high risk patients when using the dipstick test, and (2) diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy using electrocardiography in subjects with different body mass index. In a third example, there was no spectrum bias for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease in subgroups of patients defined by age, sex or comorbidities when using exercise electrocardiography. As sensitivity and specificity usually vary in opposite directions from one subgroup to the other, the ratio of LRs tends to remain constant, resulting in no or little spectrum bias. We conclude that spectrum effect is more common than spectrum bias and that clinical decisions are affected only under certain conditions. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14695644     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  Clinimetrics corner: the many faces of selection bias.

Authors:  Eric J Hegedus; Jennifer Moody
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2010-06

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of major depression disorder case-finding instruments used among mothers of young children in the United States: A systematic review.

Authors:  Arthur H Owora; Hélène Carabin; Jessica Reese; Tabitha Garwe
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Differentiation of malignant and benign pulmonary nodules with first-pass dual-input perfusion CT.

Authors:  Xiaodong Yuan; Jing Zhang; Changbin Quan; Jianxia Cao; Guokun Ao; Yuan Tian; Hong Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  The diagnostic performance of multi-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Daniel A Ollendorf; Michelle Kuba; Steven D Pearson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) consensus guidelines on invasive and non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a 2016 update.

Authors:  Gamal Shiha; Alaa Ibrahim; Ahmed Helmy; Shiv Kumar Sarin; Masao Omata; Ashish Kumar; David Bernstien; Hitushi Maruyama; Vivek Saraswat; Yogesh Chawla; Saeed Hamid; Zaigham Abbas; Pierre Bedossa; Puja Sakhuja; Mamun Elmahatab; Seng Gee Lim; Laurentius Lesmana; Jose Sollano; Ji-Dong Jia; Bahaa Abbas; Ashraf Omar; Barjesh Sharma; Diana Payawal; Ahmed Abdallah; Abdelhamid Serwah; Abdelkhalek Hamed; Aly Elsayed; Amany AbdelMaqsod; Tarek Hassanein; Ahmed Ihab; Hamsik GHaziuan; Nizar Zein; Manoj Kumar
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 6.047

6.  Bayes Lines Tool (BLT): a SQL-script for analyzing diagnostic test results with an application to SARS-CoV-2-testing.

Authors:  Wouter Aukema; Bobby Rajesh Malhotra; Simon Goddek; Ulrike Kämmerer; Peter Borger; Kevin McKernan; Rainer Johannes Klement
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2021-05-10

7.  Effect of clinical spectrum, inoculum size and physician characteristics on sensitivity of a rapid antigen detection test for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  J F Cohen; M Chalumeau; C Levy; P Bidet; M Benani; M Koskas; E Bingen; R Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 8.  Recognition of depression by non-psychiatric physicians--a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monica Cepoiu; Jane McCusker; Martin G Cole; Maida Sewitch; Eric Belzile; Antonio Ciampi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Stress cardiac MR imaging compared with stress echocardiography in the early evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department with intermediate-risk chest pain.

Authors:  John F Heitner; Igor Klem; Derek Rasheed; Abhinav Chandra; Han W Kim; Lowie M R Van Assche; Michele Parker; Robert M Judd; James G Jollis; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Italian version of the short 10/66 dementia diagnostic schedule: a validation study.

Authors:  Aliaa Ibnidris; Giovanni Piumatti; Fabio Carlevaro; Marta Fadda; Francesca Magno; Daniele Magistro; Emiliano Albanese
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.