Literature DB >> 14693626

A comparison of duration of analgesia of intrathecal 2.5 mg of bupivacaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine in combined spinal epidural analgesia for patients in labor.

Yvonne Lim1, Cecilia E Ocampo, Alex T Sia.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We assessed the duration of labor analgesia rendered by intrathecal (IT) local anesthetics as the sole drugs. In this randomized, controlled, and double-blinded study, labor analgesia was induced using combined spinal-epidural technique in 60 ASA physical status I nulliparous parturients with IT bupivacaine 2.5 mg (group B), ropivacaine 2.5 mg (group R), or levobupivacaine 2.5 mg (group L). Pain scores (0-100 visual analog scale) and blood pressure were recorded pre-block and for the first 30 min post-block. The degree of motor block and the highest sensory block were also monitored. The duration of analgesia (our primary outcome) was the longest in group B but was similar between groups R and L (mean +/- SE, 76.3 +/- 5.9 min versus 52.6 +/- 4.0 min and 51.5 +/- 3.4 min, respectively, P < 0.05). Group B had the most frequent incidence of lower limb motor block but there was no difference between groups R and L (5 of 20 parturients versus 2 of 20 and 0 of 20, respectively, P < 0.05). The profile of the other side effects was indistinguishable between the groups. With the current regimen, IT bupivacaine produced the longest duration of labor analgesia. IMPLICATIONS: Intrathecal 2.5 mg bupivacaine significantly prolongs the duration of analgesia in laboring patients compared with ropivacaine or levobupivacaine. This suggests that, at clinically relevant doses, bupivacaine may have greater potency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14693626     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000094338.80430.c5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Monique P Curran; Vicki Oldfield; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Anaesthetic agents for advanced regional anaesthesia: a North American perspective.

Authors:  Chester C Buckenmaier; Lisa L Bleckner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  [Levobupivacaine for regional anesthesia. A systematic review].

Authors:  B Urbanek; S Kapral
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Levobupivacaine in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. Where is its place?].

Authors:  D H Bremerich; B Zwissler
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Chantal A A Heppolette; Derek Brunnen; Sohail Bampoe; Peter M Odor
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Interaction of local anesthetics with biomembranes consisting of phospholipids and cholesterol: mechanistic and clinical implications for anesthetic and cardiotoxic effects.

Authors:  Hironori Tsuchiya; Maki Mizogami
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2013-09-23

7.  Comparative study of intrathecal hyperbaric versus isobaric ropivacaine: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Rajni Gupta; Jaishri Bogra; Prithvi Kumar Singh; Sulekha Saxena; Girish Chandra; Jitendra Kumar Kushwaha
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07

8.  Membrane interactivity of charged local anesthetic derivative and stereoselectivity in membrane interaction of local anesthetic enantiomers.

Authors:  Hironori Tsuchiya; Maki Mizogami
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2008-08-06

9.  Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine.

Authors:  Crina L Burlacu; Donal J Buggy
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Fentanyl versus tramadol with levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labor.

Authors:  Veena Chatrath; Ranjana Khetarpal; Sujata Sharma; Pratibha Kumari; Kusum Bali
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.