Literature DB >> 14691235

Packing, specificity, and mutability at the binding interface between the p160 coactivator and CREB-binding protein.

Stephen J Demarest1, Songpon Deechongkit, H Jane Dyson, Ronald M Evans, Peter E Wright.   

Abstract

Among the most common interaction motifs between nuclear proteins is the recognition of one or more amphipathic helices. In an effort to determine principles behind this recognition, we have investigated the interaction between the p160 coactivator protein ACTR and the ACTR-binding domain of the CREB-binding protein, CBP. The two proteins use relatively small portions of their primary sequences to form a single synergistically folded domain consisting of six intertwined alpha-helices, three from each protein. Neither of the component polypeptides forms a cooperatively folded domain in isolation. However, a considerable amount of residual secondary structure remains in the isolated CBP domain according to CD spectroscopy. Chemical denaturation, differential scanning calorimetry, and ANS binding experiments demonstrate that the isolated CBP domain is not entirely unfolded but forms a helical state with the characteristics of a molten globule. Mutations probing the functional and energetic significance of a buried intermolecular Arg-Asp salt bridge in the interface of the protein complex suggest that these residues are tuned for functional discrimination and not strictly for binding affinity or stability. These results suggest a mechanism for formation of the complex where the unfolded ACTR domain interacts with the partly folded CBP domain in a rapid and specific manner to form the final stable complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14691235      PMCID: PMC2286511          DOI: 10.1110/ps.03366504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  32 in total

Review 1.  Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition.

Authors:  C O Pabo; R T Sauer
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 2.  Intermediate states in protein folding.

Authors:  P L Privalov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-05-24       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  The coactivator TIF2 contains three nuclear receptor-binding motifs and mediates transactivation through CBP binding-dependent and -independent pathways.

Authors:  J J Voegel; M J Heine; M Tini; V Vivat; P Chambon; H Gronemeyer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Nuclear receptor coactivator ACTR is a novel histone acetyltransferase and forms a multimeric activation complex with P/CAF and CBP/p300.

Authors:  H Chen; R J Lin; R L Schiltz; D Chakravarti; A Nash; L Nagy; M L Privalsky; Y Nakatani; R M Evans
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-08-08       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Structural basis for antagonist-mediated recruitment of nuclear co-repressors by PPARalpha.

Authors:  H Eric Xu; Thomas B Stanley; Valerie G Montana; Millard H Lambert; Barry G Shearer; Jeffery E Cobb; David D McKee; Cristin M Galardi; Kelli D Plunket; Robert T Nolte; Derek J Parks; John T Moore; Steven A Kliewer; Timothy M Willson; Julie B Stimmel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Nuclear receptors: structure, function and involvement in disease.

Authors:  S Tenbaum; A Baniahmad
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.085

7.  Structure of the p53 tumor suppressor bound to the ankyrin and SH3 domains of 53BP2.

Authors:  S Gorina; N P Pavletich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Steroid hormone receptors: many actors in search of a plot.

Authors:  M Beato; P Herrlich; G Schütz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Thermodynamic puzzle of apomyoglobin unfolding.

Authors:  Y V Griko; P L Privalov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-01-28       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Ligand binding and co-activator assembly of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma.

Authors:  R T Nolte; G B Wisely; S Westin; J E Cobb; M H Lambert; R Kurokawa; M G Rosenfeld; T M Willson; C K Glass; M V Milburn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  32 in total

1.  Is a malleable protein necessarily highly dynamic? The hydrophobic core of the nuclear coactivator binding domain is well ordered.

Authors:  Magnus Kjaergaard; Flemming M Poulsen; Kaare Teilum
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Expanding the Range of Protein Function at the Far End of the Order-Structure Continuum.

Authors:  Virginia M Burger; Diego O Nolasco; Collin M Stultz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Dynamic equilibrium engagement of a polyvalent ligand with a single-site receptor.

Authors:  Tanja Mittag; Stephen Orlicky; Wing-Yiu Choy; Xiaojing Tang; Hong Lin; Frank Sicheri; Lewis E Kay; Mike Tyers; Julie D Forman-Kay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  HyRes: a coarse-grained model for multi-scale enhanced sampling of disordered protein conformations.

Authors:  Xiaorong Liu; Jianhan Chen
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.676

5.  Fast association and slow transitions in the interaction between two intrinsically disordered protein domains.

Authors:  Jakob Dogan; Tanja Schmidt; Xin Mu; Åke Engström; Per Jemth
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Competitive binding between dynamic p53 transactivation subdomains to human MDM2 protein: implications for regulating the p53·MDM2/MDMX interaction.

Authors:  Bing Shan; Da-Wei Li; Lei Brüschweiler-Li; Rafael Brüschweiler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Mapping the transition state for a binding reaction between ancient intrinsically disordered proteins.

Authors:  Elin Karlsson; Cristina Paissoni; Amanda M Erkelens; Zeinab A Tehranizadeh; Frieda A Sorgenfrei; Eva Andersson; Weihua Ye; Carlo Camilloni; Per Jemth
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  The Cytoplasm-Entry Domain of Antibacterial CdiA Is a Dynamic α-Helical Bundle with Disulfide-Dependent Structural Features.

Authors:  Nicholas L Bartelli; Sheng Sun; Grant C Gucinski; Hongjun Zhou; Kiho Song; Christopher S Hayes; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Mapping the interactions of adenoviral E1A proteins with the p160 nuclear receptor coactivator binding domain of CBP.

Authors:  Peter Haberz; Munehito Arai; Maria A Martinez-Yamout; H Jane Dyson; Peter E Wright
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Coupled Binding and Helix Formation Monitored by Synchrotron-Radiation Circular Dichroism.

Authors:  Elin Karlsson; Eva Andersson; Nykola C Jones; Søren Vrønning Hoffmann; Per Jemth; Magnus Kjaergaard
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.