Literature DB >> 14690001

The impact of FDG PET on the management of occult primary head and neck tumours.

W L Wong1, M Saunders.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of positron-emission tomography (PET) with 18F-labelled fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in the management of occult primary head and neck tumours.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed 16 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and one patient with undifferentiated carcinoma of cervical lymph nodes (N1-4; N2a-9; N2b-2; N3-2). All patients had full clinical assessment, including examination under anaesthesia (EUA), with biopsy of all suspicious areas and random biopsies of sites likely to harbour an occult primary site. Nine patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck, three underwent computed tomography (CT) and five underwent both CT and MRI. None of these studies were able to locate a primary tumour. Patients received 350 MBq FDG intravenously. Emission transmission scans of the extra-cranial head, neck and thorax were obtained using an ECAT Exact 47 at least 60 min after injection. The images were interpreted by the same radiologist experienced in PET, independent of the final outcome. The influence of FDG PET on management was assessed on review of the patients' notes after treatment or when treatment had been deemed unnecessary.
RESULTS: FDG PET suggested a primary site in eight of the 17 patients (tongue base 5; nasopharynx 1; tonsil 1: supraglottis 1). Pathological confirmation was obtained in four patients and one patient died of progressive disease at the primary site. In nine patients, the primary site was not identified on FDG PET. In six of these patients, no primary site was found during follow-up (range 8-36 months: mean 20 months). One patient died before treatment commenced, and there were two histologically confirmed false-negative FDG PET results: one tonsil SCC and one lateral pharyngeal wall SCC. FDG PET affected treatment plans in nine of the 17 (53%) patients in whom a primary site was suggested (altered radiotherapy plan 6; radiotherapy with curative intent to palliative radiotherapy 1; radiotherapy to surgery and post-operative radiotherapy 1), and in one patient where no occult primary was localised (radiotherapy to surgery 1). FDG PET had a sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of 62%, 66%, 62% and 62%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14690001     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2003.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  7 in total

1.  Role of 18F-FDG PET in detecting primary site in the patient with primary unknown carcinoma.

Authors:  Kenichiro Yabuki; Mamoru Tsukuda; Choichi Horiuchi; Takahide Taguchi; Goshi Nishimura
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar remnant--clinical presentation and oncological outcome.

Authors:  Christopher J Skilbeck; Jean-Pierre Jeannon; Mary O'Connell; Peter R Morgan; Ricard Simo
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-01-19

3.  TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Veit-Haibach; Christopher Luczak; Isabel Wanke; Markus Fischer; Thomas Egelhof; Thomas Beyer; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra Rosenbaum; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Metabolic tumor volume predicts for recurrence and death in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Trang H La; Edith J Filion; Brit B Turnbull; Jackie N Chu; Percy Lee; Khoa Nguyen; Peter Maxim; Andy Quon; Edward E Graves; Billy W Loo; Quynh-Thu Le
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  PET in face and neck tumours.

Authors:  Sheila C Rankin
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Clinical Applications of FDG PET and PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Akram Al-Ibraheem; Andreas Buck; Bernd Joachim Krause; Klemens Scheidhauer; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 7.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.