Literature DB >> 14689211

Neuroblastoma detected by mass screening: the Tumor Board's role in its treatment.

Tadaharu Okazaki1, Sumio Kohno, Jun-ichi Mimaya, Shiro Hasegawa, Naoto Urushihara, Atsushi Yoshida, Shinya Kawano, Junichi Kusafuka, Yasuo Horikoshi, Yoshifumi Takashima, Katsuhiko Aoki, Minoru Hamazaki.   

Abstract

Japan has a nationwide mass-screening program for neuroblastoma in 6-month-old infants. Neuroblastoma can regress spontaneously, and some institutions observe selected cases. We evaluated the management of screened neuroblastoma at our hospital since 1997 when an observation program was introduced. Criteria for the observation program were stage-I, stage-II, or stage-IVs tumors, urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) and homovanillic acid (HVA) levels <40 microg/mg creatinine, tumor <5 cm in diameter, no invasion to the intraspinal canal or great vessels, and parental consent to participate. Patients who did not meet observation criteria underwent surgery or mild chemotherapy according to the location of the tumor. If patients met observation criteria after chemotherapy, surgical intervention was no longer performed. Thirty-six patients attended our hospital for screened neuroblastoma from 1997 to 2002. Thirty-three patients who were managed at our hospital participated in this study. Ten subjects met observation criteria. Tumors regressed in 7 patients (mean follow-up period 36.3 months) with corresponding decreases in VMA and HVA levels (group A). Three underwent surgery (group B) because of increasing VMA and HVA levels, increase in tumor size, or guardian's request. Twenty-three subjects did not meet observation criteria. Four patients underwent primary surgery (group C), and 19 patients had chemotherapy initially. Fourteen patients met observation criteria after chemotherapy and two are still having chemotherapy (group D). Three patients required surgery due to insufficient regression of their tumors (group E). Fourteen subjects in group D had marked decreases in VMA and HVA levels and tumor size (mean follow-up period 29.1 months), and tumors were not detected using imaging techniques in 8 patients. Histological examination of all resected specimens during the study period showed favorable histology and no N-myc amplification. There was no evidence of unfavorable prognosis in any of the 33 subjects, although 1 patient who underwent primary surgery had a vanishing kidney 1 year later and 1 patient had multiple bony metastases after complete resection of tumor, which was treated by chemotherapy. Until the real significance of mass screening for neuroblastoma as a public health measure is confirmed, observation with careful follow-up should be adopted more extensively because it has a favorable outcome in many cases, and is associated with minimal therapeutic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14689211     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-003-1070-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  19 in total

1.  Effects of the mass screening of neuroblastoma in Sapporo City.

Authors:  M Nishi; H Miyake; T Takeda; M Shimada; N Takasugi; Y Sato; J Hanai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Maturation of mass-screened localized adrenal neuroblastoma.

Authors:  T Iwanaka; K Yamamoto; Y Ogawa; M Arai; M Ito; H Kishimoto; R Hanada; S Imaizumi
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.545

3.  A population-based study of the usefulness of screening for neuroblastoma.

Authors:  W G Woods; M Tuchman; L L Robison; M Bernstein; J M Leclerc; L C Brisson; J Brossard; G Hill; J Shuster; R Luepker; T Byrne; S Weitzman; G Bunin; B Lemieux
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Screening of infants and mortality due to neuroblastoma.

Authors:  William G Woods; Ru-Nie Gao; Jonathan J Shuster; Leslie L Robison; Mark Bernstein; Sheila Weitzman; Greta Bunin; Isra Levy; Josee Brossard; Geoffrey Dougherty; Mendel Tuchman; Bernard Lemieux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age.

Authors:  Freimut H Schilling; Claudia Spix; Frank Berthold; Rudolf Erttmann; Natalja Fehse; Barbara Hero; Gisela Klein; Johannes Sander; Kerstin Schwarz; Joern Treuner; Ulrich Zorn; Joerg Michaelis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  A proposed staging for children with neuroblastoma. Children's cancer study group A.

Authors:  A E Evans; G J D'Angio; J Randolph
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Mass screening for neuroblastoma in infants in Japan. Interim report of a mass screening study group.

Authors:  T Sawada; M Hirayama; T Nakata; T Takeda; N Takasugi; T Mori; K Maeda; R Koide; Y Hanawa; A Tsunoda
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-08-04       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Mass screening in Japan increased the detection of infants with neuroblastoma without a decrease in cases in older children.

Authors:  F Bessho; K Hashizume; T Nakajo; S Kamoshita
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Disseminated neuroblastoma (stage IV and IV-S) in the first year of life. Outcome related to age and stage. Italian Cooperative Group on Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  B De Bernardi; C Pianca; L Boni; M Brisigotti; M Carli; S Bagnulo; P Corciulo; A Mancini; C De Laurentis; M T Di Tullio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mass screening and age-specific incidence of neuroblastoma in Saitama Prefecture, Japan.

Authors:  K Yamamoto; Y Hayashi; R Hanada; A Kikuchi; M Ichikawa; M Tanimura; S Yoshioka
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Neuroblastoma in childhood: review and radiological findings.

Authors:  Georgia Papaioannou; Kieran McHugh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  A prospective study of expectant observation as primary therapy for neuroblastoma in young infants: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Jed G Nuchtern; Wendy B London; Carol E Barnewolt; Arlene Naranjo; Patrick W McGrady; James D Geiger; Lisa Diller; Mary Lou Schmidt; John M Maris; Susan L Cohn; Robert C Shamberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Renal and adrenal tumours in children.

Authors:  Kieran McHugh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-03-05       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Neuroblastoma Mass Screening--What Can We Learn From It?

Authors:  Kota Katanoda
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.211

5.  Secular trends in neuroblastoma mortality before and after the cessation of national mass screening in Japan.

Authors:  Kota Katanoda; Kunihiko Hayashi; Keiko Yamamoto; Tomotaka Sobue
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  An Example of Breast Cancer Regression on Imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Frederick Kelcz; Jannette Collins
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-06

7.  Effects of the Cessation of Mass Screening for Neuroblastoma at 6 Months of Age: A Population-Based Study in Osaka, Japan.

Authors:  Akiko Ioka; Masami Inoue; Akihiro Yoneda; Tetsuro Nakamura; Junichi Hara; Yoshiko Hashii; Naoki Sakata; Kazumi Yamato; Hideaki Tsukuma; Keisei Kawa
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.211

8.  Spontaneous Slowing and Regressing of Tumor Growth in Childhood/Adolescent Papillary Thyroid Carcinomas Suggested by the Postoperative Thyroglobulin-Doubling Time.

Authors:  Toshihiko Kasahara; Akira Miyauchi; Takumi Kudo; Eijun Nishihara; Mitsuru Ito; Yasuhiro Ito; Minoru Kihara; Akihiro Miya
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2018-05-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.