Literature DB >> 11932471

Neuroblastoma screening at one year of age.

Freimut H Schilling1, Claudia Spix, Frank Berthold, Rudolf Erttmann, Natalja Fehse, Barbara Hero, Gisela Klein, Johannes Sander, Kerstin Schwarz, Joern Treuner, Ulrich Zorn, Joerg Michaelis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma is the second most common type of childhood tumor. It is not known whether screening for neuroblastoma at one year of age reduces the incidence of metastatic disease or mortality due to neuroblastoma.
METHODS: We offered urine screening for neuroblastoma at approximately one year of age to 2,581,188 children in 6 of 16 German states from 1995 to 2000. A total of 2,117,600 eligible children in the remaining states served as controls. We compared the two groups in terms of the incidence of disseminated disease and mortality from neuroblastoma.
RESULTS: A total of 1,475,773 children (61.2 percent of those who were born between July 1, 1994, and October 31, 1999) underwent screening. In this group, neuroblastoma was detected by screening in 149 children, of whom 3 have died. Fifty-five children who had negative screening tests were subsequently given a diagnosis of neuroblastoma; 14 of these children have died. The screened group and children in the control area had a similar incidence of stage 4 neuroblastoma (3.7 cases per 100,000 screened children [95 percent confidence interval, 2.7 to 4.7] and 3.8 per 100,000 controls [95 percent confidence interval, 2.9 to 4.6]) and a similar rate of death among children with neuroblastoma (1.3 deaths per 100,000 screened children [95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 1.8] and 1.2 per 100,000 controls [95 percent confidence interval, 0.7 to 1.7]). Comparison of the screened group and the children in the control area revealed substantial overdiagnosis in the former group (an estimated rate of 7 cases per 100,000 children [95 percent confidence interval, 4.6 to 9.2]); the overdiagnosis rate represents children who had neuroblastoma that was diagnosed by screening but who would not benefit from earlier diagnosis and treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The present findings do not support the usefulness of general screening for neuroblastoma at one year of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11932471     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa012277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  63 in total

Review 1.  Advancing the paradigm for cardiovascular imaging research.

Authors:  Michael S Lauer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  [Principles and fields of application of screening procedures].

Authors:  M Blettner; C Spix
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Clinical, biologic, and prognostic differences on the basis of primary tumor site in neuroblastoma: a report from the international neuroblastoma risk group project.

Authors:  Kieuhoa T Vo; Katherine K Matthay; John Neuhaus; Wendy B London; Barbara Hero; Peter F Ambros; Akira Nakagawara; Doug Miniati; Kate Wheeler; Andrew D J Pearson; Susan L Cohn; Steven G DuBois
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Screening for coronary heart disease: cardiology through the oncology looking glass.

Authors:  D Douglas Miller; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Conceptualizing overdiagnosis in cancer screening.

Authors:  Pamela M Marcus; Philip C Prorok; Anthony B Miller; Emily J DeVoto; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  [Screening from an epidemiologic perspective].

Authors:  N Becker
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Time trends and prognostic factors for survival from childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Registry of Piedmont (Italy).

Authors:  Elisa Dama; Guido Pastore; Maria Luisa Mosso; Milena Maria Maule; Luisa Zuccolo; Corrado Magnani; Franco Merletti
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.183

9.  Neuroblastoma detected by mass screening: the Tumor Board's role in its treatment.

Authors:  Tadaharu Okazaki; Sumio Kohno; Jun-ichi Mimaya; Shiro Hasegawa; Naoto Urushihara; Atsushi Yoshida; Shinya Kawano; Junichi Kusafuka; Yasuo Horikoshi; Yoshifumi Takashima; Katsuhiko Aoki; Minoru Hamazaki
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 1.827

10.  Outcomes research in cardiovascular imaging: report of a workshop sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Allen Taylor; Diane Bild; Robert Bonow; Philip Greenland; Michael Lauer; Frank Peacock; James Udelson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.