Literature DB >> 14688101

Single intranasal mucosal Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination confers improved protection compared to subcutaneous vaccination against pulmonary tuberculosis.

Lihao Chen1, Jun Wang, Anna Zganiacz, Zhou Xing.   

Abstract

Whether the intranasal (i.n.) route of Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination provides better protection against pulmonary tuberculosis than subcutaneous (s.c.) vaccination remains an incompletely solved issue. In the present study, we compared both immune responses and protection elicited by single BCG vaccinations via the i.n. or s.c. route in BALB/c mice. While both i.n. and s.c. vaccination triggered comparable levels of primary immune activation in the spleen and draining lymph nodes, i.n. vaccination led to a greater antigen-specific gamma interferon recall response in splenocytes than s.c. vaccination upon secondary respiratory mycobacterial challenge, accompanied by an increased frequency of antigen-specific lymphocytes. There was also a quicker cellular response in the lungs of i.n. vaccinated mice upon mycobacterial challenge. Mice vaccinated i.n. were found to be much better protected, particularly in the lung, than s.c. vaccinated counterparts against pulmonary tuberculosis at both 3 and 6 months postvaccination. These results suggest that the i.n. route of vaccination improves the protective effect of the current BCG vaccine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14688101      PMCID: PMC344011          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.238-246.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  38 in total

Review 1.  Mucosal immunity in the lung and upper airway.

Authors:  J M Kyd; A R Foxwell; A W Cripps
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2001-03-21       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Immunology of tuberculosis.

Authors:  J L Flynn; J Chan
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 3.  Targeting the mucosa: genetically engineered vaccines and mucosal immune responses.

Authors:  L Stevceva; A G Abimiku; G Franchini
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.676

Review 4.  The search for new vaccines against tuberculosis.

Authors:  I M Orme
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.962

Review 5.  Nasal vaccines.

Authors:  S S Davis
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2001-09-23       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 6.  Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity.

Authors:  P E Fine
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-11-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Vaccination strategies for mucosal immune responses.

Authors:  P L Ogra; H Faden; R C Welliver
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Lymphocyte recruitment and protective efficacy against pulmonary mycobacterial infection are independent of the route of prior Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization.

Authors:  Umaimainthan Palendira; Andrew G D Bean; Carl G Feng; Warwick J Britton
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Systemic and mucosal immunity induced by BCG vector expressing outer-surface protein A of Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  S Langermann; S Palaszynski; A Sadziene; C K Stover; S Koenig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Intranasal BCG vaccination protects BALB/c mice against virulent Mycobacterium bovis and accelerates production of IFN-gamma in their lungs.

Authors:  I V Lyadova; H M Vordermeier; E B Eruslanov; S V Khaidukov; A S Apt; R G Hewinson
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  60 in total

1.  Evaluation of a temperature-restricted, mucosal tuberculosis vaccine in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Tuhina Gupta; Monica LaGatta; Shelly Helms; Rebecca L Pavlicek; Simon O Owino; Kaori Sakamoto; Tamas Nagy; Stephen B Harvey; Mark Papania; Stephanie Ledden; Kevin T Schultz; Candace McCombs; Frederick D Quinn; Russell K Karls
Journal:  Tuberculosis (Edinb)       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.131

2.  A novel nanoemulsion vaccine induces mucosal Interleukin-17 responses and confers protection upon Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge in mice.

Authors:  Mushtaq Ahmed; Douglas M Smith; Tarek Hamouda; Javier Rangel-Moreno; Ali Fattom; Shabaana A Khader
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  CD4 T cells producing IFN-gamma in the lungs of mice challenged with mycobacteria express a CD27-negative phenotype.

Authors:  I V Lyadova; S Oberdorf; M A Kapina; A S Apt; S L Swain; P C Sayles
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Nanoparticle conjugation of antigen enhances cytotoxic T-cell responses in pulmonary vaccination.

Authors:  Chiara Nembrini; Armando Stano; Karen Y Dane; Marie Ballester; André J van der Vlies; Benjamin J Marsland; Melody A Swartz; Jeffrey A Hubbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Prospects in Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette et Guérin (BCG) vaccine diversity and delivery: why does BCG fail to protect against tuberculosis?

Authors:  Juan I Moliva; Joanne Turner; Jordi B Torrelles
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Dose-dependent immune response to Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination in neonates.

Authors:  Virginia Davids; Willem Hanekom; Sebastian J Gelderbloem; Anthony Hawkridge; Gregory Hussey; Ronel Sheperd; Lesley Workman; Jorge Soler; Rose Ann Murray; Stanley R Ress; Gilla Kaplan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-12-20

7.  Aerosol vaccination with AERAS-402 elicits robust cellular immune responses in the lungs of rhesus macaques but fails to protect against high-dose Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge.

Authors:  Patricia A Darrah; Diane L Bolton; Andrew A Lackner; Deepak Kaushal; Pyone Pyone Aye; Smriti Mehra; James L Blanchard; Peter J Didier; Chad J Roy; Srinivas S Rao; David A Hokey; Charles A Scanga; Donata R Sizemore; Jerald C Sadoff; Mario Roederer; Robert A Seder
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Specific T cell induction using iron oxide based nanoparticles as subunit vaccine adjuvant.

Authors:  Lázaro Moreira Marques Neto; Nicholas Zufelato; Ailton Antônio de Sousa-Júnior; Monalisa Martins Trentini; Adeliane Castro da Costa; Andris Figueiroa Bakuzis; André Kipnis; Ana Paula Junqueira-Kipnis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Influenza virus NS vectors expressing the mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 protein induce CD4+ Th1 immune response and protect animals against tuberculosis challenge.

Authors:  Sabine Sereinig; Marina Stukova; Natalia Zabolotnyh; Boris Ferko; Christian Kittel; Julia Romanova; Tatiana Vinogradova; Hermann Katinger; Oleg Kiselev; Andrej Egorov
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2006-08

10.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of "Mycobacterium w" against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice immunized with live versus heat-killed M. w by the aerosol or parenteral route.

Authors:  Ankan Gupta; Nishamol Geetha; Jiju Mani; Pramod Upadhyay; V M Katoch; M Natrajan; U D Gupta; Sangeeta Bhaskar
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-11-03       Impact factor: 3.441

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.