Literature DB >> 14687229

Detection of subgingival calculus and dentine caries by laser fluorescence.

Eriko Kurihara1, Takeyoshi Koseki, Kenjiro Gohara, Tatsuji Nishihara, Toshihiro Ansai, Tadamichi Takehara.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Detection of subgingival calculus and dentine caries in the bottom of deep periodontal pockets is often difficult without visual observation. We thus examined the possibility of its detection using autofluorescence induced by laser irritation.
METHODS: Autofluorescence was measured at various excitation and emission wavelength settings in five specimens each of sound dentine and enamel, subgingival calculus, and root caries. Periodontopathic model teeth with bacterial cells and blood clots were also irritated by laser to obtain autofluorescent images.
RESULTS: Subgingival calculus and dentine caries showed a characteristic 700 nm emission when excited at 635 nm or a 720 nm emission when excited at 655 nm; sound dentine or enamel, however, did not. The calculus differentiation power, however, was higher with excitation at 635 nm than at 655 nm. The autofluorescent images photographed at an excitation of 633 nm provided clear calculus identification in periodontopathic model teeth when a 700 nm band-pass filter or a 700 nm high-pass filter was used. However, fluorescence intensity was masked when the calculus surface was covered by bacterial cells or blood clots. For clinical use, it would be important to remove subgingival plaque and debris from root surfaces before attempting to detect subgingival calculus and root caries with this manner.
CONCLUSION: The autofluorescence method employing excitation of 633-635 nm was found to be a powerful tool for detecting subgingival calculus and root caries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14687229     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2004.00712.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontal Res        ISSN: 0022-3484            Impact factor:   4.419


  8 in total

1.  Improved detection of subgingival calculus by laser fluorescence over differential reflectometry.

Authors:  Fardad Shakibaie; Kristina Law; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Performance differences in the detection of subgingival calculus by laser fluorescence devices.

Authors:  Fardad Shakibaie; Laurence J Walsh
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Spectroscopic and thermal analysis of a submandibular sialolith of Wharton's duct resected using Nd:YAG laser.

Authors:  R S Jayasree; A K Gupta; V Vivek; V U Nayar
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Image-Guided Ablation of Dental Calculus From Root Surfaces Using a DPSS Er:YAG Laser.

Authors:  William A Fried; Kenneth H Chan; Cynthia L Darling; Donald A Curtis; Daniel Fried
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 5.  Dental optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Hsieh; Yi-Ching Ho; Shyh-Yuan Lee; Ching-Cheng Chuang; Jui-che Tsai; Kun-Feng Lin; Chia-Wei Sun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  In vitro performance of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence device for dental calculus detection on human tooth root surfaces.

Authors:  Thomas E Rams; Abdulaziz Y Alwaqyan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-08-09

7.  Optical Polarimetric Detection for Dental Hard Tissue Diseases Characterization.

Authors:  Tien-Yu Hsiao; Shyh-Yuan Lee; Chia-Wei Sun
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Resolution of localized chronic periodontitis associated with longstanding calculus deposits.

Authors:  Pin-Chuang Lai; John D Walters
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-05-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.