Literature DB >> 14687055

Safety of birth centre care: perinatal mortality over a 10-year period.

Karin Gottvall1, Charlotta Grunewald, Ulla Waldenström.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study perinatal mortality in women booked for birth centre care during pregnancy.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: In-hospital birth centre and standard maternity care in Stockholm. POPULATION: Two thousand and five hundred and thirty-four women (3256 pregnancies) admitted to an in-hospital birth centre over 10 years (1989-2000) and 126818 women (180380 pregnancies) who gave birth in standard care during the same period and who met the same medical inclusion criteria as in the birth centre. Multiple pregnancies were excluded.
METHODS: Data were collected from the Swedish Medical Birth Register. Information on all cases of perinatal death in the birth centre group was retrieved from the medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Perinatal mortality.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the overall perinatal mortality rate was observed between the birth centre group and the standard care group (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.4), but infants of primiparas were at greater risk (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.9). Infants of multiparas tended to be at lower risk, but this difference was not statistically significant (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.9). These figures were adjusted for maternal age and gestation in multiple regression analyses.
CONCLUSION: Birth centre care may be less safe for infants of first-time mothers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14687055     DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.00017.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  7 in total

1.  Do we have enough evidence to judge midwife led maternity units safe? No.

Authors:  James Drife
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-29

Review 2.  Group versus conventional antenatal care for women.

Authors:  Christine J Catling; Nancy Medley; Maralyn Foureur; Clare Ryan; Nicky Leap; Alison Teate; Caroline S E Homer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-04

3.  Physician-led, hospital-linked, birth care centers can decrease cesarean section rates without increasing rates of adverse events.

Authors:  Margaret H O'Hara; Linda M Frazier; Travis W Stembridge; Robert S McKay; Sandra N Mohr; Stuart L Shalat
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.689

4.  Is the operative delivery rate in low-risk women dependent on the level of birth care? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S Bernitz; R Rolland; E Blix; M Jacobsen; K Sjøborg; P Øian
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  From little things, big things grow: a local approach to system-wide maternity services reform in the absence of definitive evidence.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Boxall; Kathy Flitcroft
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-09-30

6.  Different settings of place of midwife-led birth: evaluation of a midwife-led birth centre.

Authors:  Jacoba van der Kooy; Johanna P de Graaf; Doctor Erwin Birnie; Semiha Denktas; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-06-18

7.  A Comparison of Midwife-Led and Medical-Led Models of Care and Their Relationship to Adverse Fetal and Neonatal Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study in New Zealand.

Authors:  Ellie Wernham; Jason Gurney; James Stanley; Lis Ellison-Loschmann; Diana Sarfati
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 11.069

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.